• howrar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There are people who are fully owners and don’t do any labour, and those who subsist entirely on their labour and don’t own anything. Would it be fair to say that the middle class is anyone who works but still owns a non-zero amount of appreciating or revenue-generating assets?

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I would argue there are at least 3 classes:

      • The impoverished class that makes their living from the charity of others

      • The working class that makes their living from their labor

      • The ownership class that makes their living from owning things

        • IronBird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          in sane countries you actually can go quite far on charity alone, most every civilized place on earth outside of the US fully understands that most crime is done out of desperation than anything else…so they insure there are plentiful safety nets.

          rock bottom in austrailia doesn’t compare to rock bottom in (insert red state of choice)

      • ulterno@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        How about those that own things and control people so much that they can somehow get enough charity to live off it?
        I somehow fail to understand how that manages to be a viable method.

    • rekabis@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      There is only ownership parasites and labour.

      FTFY. You’re welcome.