Honestly, we’re at the point now where anyone attempting to downplay anything related to this is so fucking obviously involved
We are at the point where thr entire elite is in on it and trying to keep it under wraps.
Yeah no kidding, the best tactic is to keep quiet and as unknown as possible
Heh so many ways to deflect when you’re involved than saying oh there’s too much focus on this pedophile. Like maybe we had lunch, dinner? Hung out once or twice…no no, just too much focus on the pedophile I hung out.
Exactly. Simply being in a photo isn’t damning by itself. Depending on where the photo was taken of course.
Especially if you’re a journalist in New York, Epstein worked in finance in NY for over a decade and was at many exclusive events.
David Brooks divorced his wife and married his research assistant. 23 years younger.
We could have been done with the focus if you had the justice department do their fucking job years ago and prosecute the pedophiles and rapists that are in the files…
He’s definitely unbiased and trustworthy…
Seriously. After what we’ve seen with Epstein papers coverage and Zionism in western media, how can anyone ever trust it again?
I have my issues with Brooks’ article, but come on. Appearing in the same place/event as Jeffrey Epstein, by itself, means nothing.
They have multiple photographs of Brooks at the event and Epstein isn’t in a single one. This is a nothingburger.
My guess is that many people who spent time around Epstein were probably not pedophiles. Maybe even the majority of them. His “day job” was a guy who knew all the powerful people and could introduce anybody to anybody else. If he had been a woman, we would have called him a socialite.
Some of the people were probably in his inner circle and participated in the child abuse. But, others were probably just using him as a way to meet royalty, or as a way to connect to VC money.
But, you know what? I’m ok if plutocrats who weren’t actually pedophiles get caught up as collateral damage.
Congress passed a law demanding disclosure of all files the government had about an infamous pedophile and child trafficer, with an explicit ban on redactions for embarrassed adults. Today they released a whole bunch of files, with essentially every adult in the pictures reacted.
Anyone who thinks this is a non-story is either a pedophile themselves or intentjonallh covering for child trafficing pediphiles. Especially if they are an old white guy who was definitely associated with the inhuman scum at the center.
We don’t know if David Brooks is a pedophile himself, but he sure as fuck isnt a journalist.
I mean, Michael Wolff is out there, with plenty of email evidence that he was a hack “journalist” that was practically a PR agent for Epstein. Why attack Brooks?
#1 apologist for the oligarchs.
Anyone who thinks this is a non-story is either a pedophile themselves or intentjonallh covering for child trafficing pediphiles
Epstein isn’t even in the photos with Brooks. Which pedophile am I covering up for, exactly?
We don’t know if David Brooks is a pedophile
That’s entirely the point.
If you’re covering for David Brooks, and we assume that Brooks is not himself a pedophile to be charitable, then you’re covering for whatever unknown pedophile Brooks is covering for.
This isn’t a court of law, it’s an international private forum with no binding consequence on anybody’s liberty. We don’t have to presume people doing shady fuck are innocent, since we’re not even accusing anyone of crimes.
Theres a photo of me with a convicted murderer and a photo of me with a convicted child sex offender.
The guy did 10 years for murder and I knew him from the custom car scene, I knew him after he got out, didnt talk about it much. I worked with the child sex offender before he got found out and sent away, that motherfucker is a fight on sight if I ever see him again.
The photos exist out there on the internet somewhere and theres jack shit I can do about it. (Actually the murderer was a pretty chill guy by the time I knew him, that photo doesnt bother me.)
Bullshit headline. Brooks is at a dinner with one of the Google founders. If Brooks was “hanging with Epstein” we’d likely see a photo of it?
Brooks just said on PBS Newshour that he didn’t know who Epstein was at the time of the dinner in 2011 and had zero comms with him. I’m going to take that at face value until there’s actual evidence presented, which is not contained in this article.
I’m glad the Epstein files are getting released but it’s inevitable that there will be shade on those named who literally have nothing to do with sex trafficking.
The Intercept, the same rag that ratted out Reality Winner, is lying with headlines? Say it ain’t so!
