What this means is that wholesale price doesn’t drop until gas -burning power plants are not being used. So it takes quite high renewables+ battery deployment to lowe wholesale price.

  • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    Are you sure that is what is happening? I doubt the utility is paying the solar supplier more than their stated price. That is not how Capitalism works over here.

    • Womble@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      That is exactly what happens, each potential provider says “I will sell you Y amount of power for at least X price” the grid tots up the offers going from cheapest up until they have enough generating capacity and then pay all the providers the highest price they needed to get to. This is all public so they cant pay the cheap provider less than the expensive one, because they can just turn round and raise their price to that same highest price, knowing that the provider wold lose more money to go to everyone else.

      (They actually do it the other way round, start at the highest price and keep lowering it and having providers drop out, until too many drop out and then the previous price is set for everyone that’s still in. But it has the same end result, everyone gets paid the lowest price that enough people are willing to sell at in order to cover demand.)

      • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Well, I’m somewhat disturbed to find you are basically right. I gather it’s partly due to the insane complexity of the market - even here on our side of the pond. The article I linked described pricing in real-time rather than for the annual auctions your reference described. A quote from the end of the article:

        It’s tempting to think electricity prices are simply the product of supply and demand, but the reality is far more choreographed. From fuel markets to regulators, the system is layered and opaque. Consumers think they are paying for power; in reality, they are funding infrastructure projects, policy goals, and investor returns.

        On the bright side, it does mean the wind and solar renewable energy producers are probably making bank. This explains why investment continues to accelerate even without subsidies.

        Eventually, capacity (in theory) will get so high for renewables that the “last provider in the chain” will not be a ludicrously expensive resource. That’d be nice. I’ll believe it when I see it.