• cuavas@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well considering there are people still blaming Kennett for everything 25 years later (even things that happened before and after he was in office), I’m sure people can keep blaming Dan for stuff for at least a decade.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        People keep blaming kennet for shit he actually did though, that had knockon effects that last for generations.

        • cuavas@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          They blame him for stuff he didn’t do as well. For example I’ve seen him blamed for introducing pokies (Kirner) and tolls on Eastlink (Bracks after backflipping on the “no new toll roads” promise).

          Also, you’d think a quarter of a century (yes, Kennett left office 25 years ago) would be long enough to make a few changes, yet here we are as the state with the lowest spend on health per capita, lowest spend on education per capita, lowest proportion of public housing, highest debt-to-GSP ratio, and a completely ineffective anti-corruption body. Labor keeps granting extensions on toll roads to Transurban, allowing Crown to keep operating no matter how dodgy they are, and doing property developers favours. Yet we have the highest paid premier in the country.

          How long can you keep blaming Kennett for stuff neither party is interested in addressing? I have no coincidence in Victorian politicians at all.

  • samson@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    The People’s Democratic Republic of Victoria is in a ruinous state after Supreme Leader and Defender of Victorian Socialism Dan Jon Un passed this morning. Residents could be seen violently sobbing on the streets near Parliament, Government House and the Leaders official residence.

    Businesses have closed due to mourning, and some suicides have been reported.

  • LineNoise@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Hopefully we see far less centralisation of decision making within the Premier’s office from here on out.

    • samson@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      ? Unless you mean within the cabinet/executive council I don’t understand why you would say this. OotP is for the premier and decisions are naturally centralised to the premier.

      • LineNoise@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Put here by Margaret Simons more succinctly than I probably can from my phone at the moment:

        Over the last couple of years, the words “tightly held” have come up in almost every conversation about Andrews government decisions.

        It reflects the way in which major policy has been developed by a small group of his most trusted people – developed in what one observer described as a “black box”, with even government ministers excluded, unless they were in the increasingly tiny circle of the favoured.

        The politicisation of the public service – its lack of ability and sometimes the will to stand up to the premier – was becoming one of the themes of the government.

        https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/sep/26/daniel-andrews-remoulded-the-state-of-victoria-but-the-wheels-were-beginning-to-wobble

        The problem was decisions occurring within the Premier’s office despite departmental or ministerial advice, and often in advance of questions being asked. It’s been a problem for years at this point but my experience of the issue really came to a head during COVID when trying to work with a DHHS / DFFH that was actually incapable of making any decision or holding to the ones that it did make and communicate with pretty deleterious outcomes.

        The problem was particularly highlighted by the step change in those interactions in March 2021 when Merlino became acting Premier.

        It was a functional issue, it’s become a major factional issue within Labor, and it’s a large element in the contempt for integrity institutions and ombudsmen that the government has shown recently.

        • samson@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s a separate issue, but to actually speak on it I completely agree that public policy and policymaking decisions should be public. The governors of this country are bound to assent to laws in council, which includes all of cabinet and if they aren’t properly aware then they can’t properly offer counsel to governor.