• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    This is like standing there watching an arsonist yell about how they’re gonna burn a house down for decades, watching them set everything up, burning your house down…

    And then saying there was nothing to do.

    Bare minimum we should have taken action when they stole Obama’s pick.

    Instead the party let it happen thinking it would hurt Hillary if a SC seat wasn’t openly on the line.

    I’m complaining about decades of inaction

    • nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes but you’re still not specifying which actions were not taken, which is the hard part.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        If there’s absolutely nothing to be done about the SC becoming more and more corrupt over decades…

        At bare minimum Id like Dem politicians to openly admit it rather than continually denying reality.

        One side only does what is explicitly allowed and has been done before, and one side will do anything even if it’s explicitly not allowed and has settled case law…

        Which side do you expect to win?

        Conservatives are willing to cheat to win, and Dems won’t even acknowledge conservatives are cheating.

        How is sticking your head in the sand and hoping it goes away the best solution our party can come up with?

        Edit:

        Just to stop this conversation, they should have legally challenged Obama’s pick being stolen.

        If they lost (which they wouldn’t have) because Obama only had one year left, then it would have been settled, and they could challenge when Trump did it in his last year.

        We didn’t fight for Obama’s pick. So we couldn’t fight trumps pick.

        Instead of any action, Dems picked to do nothing and let Republicans win both times.

        Most people realize this is a bad strategy, at least by now. But most saw it coming long ago

    • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      And then saying there was nothing to do.

      Bare minimum we should have taken action when they stole Obama’s pick.

      I’m complaining about decades of inaction

      None of this addresses the question, do what? If the Republicans hold the White House or either branch of Congress there is nothing that can be done; at least no proactively, which leaves obstruction.

      But that wouldn’t change anything, so what actions could they have taken and how? It’s really easy to say “do something” as long as it’s not on you to say what should be done and how it should be accomplished.

      The Senate refused to confirm Garland, how do you seat a Supreme Court justice without the advice and consent of the Senate? Congress even refused to take a recess to block Obama’s ability to make recess appointments. The Republicans would leave a member behind to open and then adjourn.

      So the question remains, do what? If you don’t have an answer then stop repeating that they should have done the thing that you can’t even think of.