• OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Progressive and conservative are two different approaches for policy. If the truth is known then there is no point discussing it. If the truth is unclear or the implications of that truth are unclear, then there needs to be discussion.

    Your example about both sidesism, bringing on an anti vaxxer, is either a deliberate straw man or a minor example that isn’t a good representative of the media trying to discuss both sides.

    But your last point I agree with completely. Neither progressives nor conservatives have the complete truth.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Your example about both sidesism, bringing on an anti vaxxer, is either a deliberate straw man or a minor example that isn’t a good representative of the media trying to discuss both sides.

      It happened constantly during COVID. Where were you?

      And now we have two antivaxxers running for president. One with a good chance of winning. And they get to talk about their “side” in the news too. Often unchallenged.

      I don’t know how you can not be aware of this.

      But your last point I agree with completely. Neither progressives nor conservatives have the complete truth.

      That’s not what I said. It’s also wrong.

      It is completely true that global warming is happening and humans are the cause no matter how much conservatives want to deny it.