Chinese doping scandal that has hung over these Paris Olympics as the events finished Sunday night.

China won the men’s 4x100-meter medley relay in 3 minutes, 27.46 seconds, with two of the four members on the team listed among 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive ahead of the Tokyo Olympics three years ago. The swimmers were allowed to compete after a Chinese investigation ruled that they consumed food that had been contaminated. 

The New York Times reported last week that two more Chinese swimmers had tested positive, including one 2024 Olympian, for a banned substance in 2022 but were cleared by Chinese officials to compete.

The World Anti-Doping Agency stood by its decision to clear the 23 swimmers who tested positive for a banned heart medication.

  • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Meanwhile Sha’Carri (US running) was DQ’d previously for having THC in her system. Still trying to wrap my head around how pot can help you run faster.

    They weren’t concerned about CBD or anything else, just the psychoactive THC.

    • khannie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      In general things that can calm your nerves in the run up to a very stressful sporting event are banned since forever.

      I can tell you as someone who used to compete at a way lower level than these folks but still way beyond the average person that nerves have a huge impact on your body and therefore performance so it does make sense.

      I’ll leave you to infer yourself how the human body responds to extreme stress and how that might affect performance. :)

      • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        That would make sense if they were looking for CBD, which is the chemical that causes the relaxing effect of weed, not THC which more or less just gives the “high” feeling. You can easily get CBD from hemp and WADA actually removed it from their ban list in 2019.

        There are also plenty of allowed substances that can help you relax, even prescription-only. They would have to ban things like; alcohol (never gonna happen), dramamine (antiemetic), diphenhydramine (antihistamine), gabapentin (anticonvulsant, Rx-only), etc… These, while primarily used for other purposes, all are occasionally used for their sedating effects and to my knowledge are all allowed.

        There was also the argument that while yes, it does help with relaxing, it will actually decrease performance on the whole.

        • khannie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I actually think all the stuff you listed could give an unfair advantage depending on the sport.

          When I was a kid alcohol was a huge aspect of professional snooker but it got banned. Like they would be having pints while waiting to take their shot. I take diphenhydramine to help me sleep occasionally and I could see that giving a very slight advantage depending on the sport too.

          My own sport relied on reflexes being on point so I’m no expert on relaxants. It’s definitely a very tricky business.

          • Cort@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            Lol, when I used to go out to bars and play billiards before covid, there was a point between 1.5 and 3 beers where I couldn’t miss a shot

    • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      THC is illegal in most of the world still. It’s like how testing positive for cocaine probably isn’t good for your odds.

      • EtherWhack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        They don’t really mention if it’s illegal or not to their reasoning. They only use three parameters for the decision.

        source

        They argue for points 2 (health risk) and 3 (commonly abused), both of which cigarettes and alcohol fit right in, but are unrestricted.

        • zephyreks@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Why, exactly, do you think THC and cocaine are illegal for recreational consumption in most of the world? Someone decided one day that they really didn’t like the way it looks?

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Cultural imperialism and racism, really. The US was the driving force behind the war on drugs, and boy were our drug laws not passed to do anything except oppress inconvenient demographic groups.