• Imp3riaLL@lemmy.world
    20·
    4 days ago

    It’s funny how she can’t string two words together but at the same time is a relentless debate machine.

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    36·
    5 days ago

    I guess that means she had those bluetooth earrings throughout her entire career as a prosecutor where she debated on a daily basis as well.

  • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
    341·
    5 days ago

    If dumpy debates her again, I’d love for her to slowly and passive aggressively remove her earrings on stage. Maybe even ask Trump to hold them for her.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      6·
      5 days ago

      B-b-but this is intimidation - she’s taking off the earrings to fight a frail old perfect specimen of a man.

      <something something nasty black woman>

      <blah-blah I NEED TO KNOW WHAT RACE SHE IS!>

      <white noise you know what we used to do with women like this back in my day, folks>

      <Macarthayism>

      <Nazism>

      <incoherent trailing off interspersed with BILLIONS AND BILLIONS rambling RADICAL LIBERALS muttering JOE BIDEN waffle ILLEGAL ALIEN TRANS CHILDREN>

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      10·
      5 days ago

      That sounds like a prog rock band who wanted to cut loose and relax a bit, so they made a a side project to do punk music. Only, they still couldn’t quite resist the urge to play in 15/8 time.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    191·
    5 days ago

    Now for extra fun: consider how different the attacks would be if Kamala Harris were a male candidate, with all other factors as close as possible (age, race, background, etc.)

    You wouldn’t be hearing about how he “slept his way” to the top. You wouldn’t be hearing about how his “handlers” had to feed him information because he isn’t capable of debating on his own without prompting. You’d still be hearing a bunch of bullshit, to be sure, but it would be different bullshit.

    The next time someone on the right tries to deflect or muddy the water with “bUt caN You eVeN giVe a sPecIfic eXampLe AboUt hOw tHe RePubLican party / MAGA / Trump Is seXiSt?”, all you must do is point to the kinds of lies they naturally fell into about Kamala Harris.

    What those higher up in the party think of women, and what the rest have chosen to align themselves to, is on full display.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    19·
    5 days ago

    Kinda funny that they inadvertently admitted that she did really well in the debate by calling her a “relentless debate machine”.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      7·
      5 days ago

      Is this literal MAGA material? I assumed it was paraphrased.

      I mean, is this not a joke about the real thing?

      • Badabinski@kbin.earth
        4·
        5 days ago

        I can’t tell either, and it’s driving me a bit crazier each time I scroll past this post. I’ll probably do a reverse image search to find out.

        EDIT: No luck with Google, Bing, Tineye, or Yandex.

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      2·
      4 days ago

      She must be a witch because there’s no way they could be attracted to a black woman… Or maybe she’s really Indian, which is more acceptable

  • dmention7@lemm.eeEnglish
    10·
    5 days ago

    I am genuinely interested in the line of logic that links “About to become leader of the free world” with "dated Montel Williams in 2001’.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      4·
      5 days ago

      This particular one has to be satire. That line. The “some dude” part. The “relentless debate machine.”

  • whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io
    10·
    5 days ago

    honestly if you’re good enough at fucking to fuck your way into one of the most powerful positions on the planet, while also having some kind of built in ability to go manchurian candidate super-politician if there’s a bluetooth speaker within a 10 foot radius, i think you should have it

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    3·
    4 days ago

    Did they forget to draw an arrow to her skin and point out how she’s either black or indian? Or is this the “friendly version”?