• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 months ago

    I guess that means she had those bluetooth earrings throughout her entire career as a prosecutor where she debated on a daily basis as well.

  • Protoknuckles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If dumpy debates her again, I’d love for her to slowly and passive aggressively remove her earrings on stage. Maybe even ask Trump to hold them for her.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      B-b-but this is intimidation - she’s taking off the earrings to fight a frail old perfect specimen of a man.

      <something something nasty black woman>

      <blah-blah I NEED TO KNOW WHAT RACE SHE IS!>

      <white noise you know what we used to do with women like this back in my day, folks>

      <Macarthayism>

      <Nazism>

      <incoherent trailing off interspersed with BILLIONS AND BILLIONS rambling RADICAL LIBERALS muttering JOE BIDEN waffle ILLEGAL ALIEN TRANS CHILDREN>

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      That sounds like a prog rock band who wanted to cut loose and relax a bit, so they made a a side project to do punk music. Only, they still couldn’t quite resist the urge to play in 15/8 time.

  • Imp3riaLL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s funny how she can’t string two words together but at the same time is a relentless debate machine.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kinda funny that they inadvertently admitted that she did really well in the debate by calling her a “relentless debate machine”.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is this literal MAGA material? I assumed it was paraphrased.

      I mean, is this not a joke about the real thing?

      • Badabinski@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        I can’t tell either, and it’s driving me a bit crazier each time I scroll past this post. I’ll probably do a reverse image search to find out.

        EDIT: No luck with Google, Bing, Tineye, or Yandex.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Now for extra fun: consider how different the attacks would be if Kamala Harris were a male candidate, with all other factors as close as possible (age, race, background, etc.)

    You wouldn’t be hearing about how he “slept his way” to the top. You wouldn’t be hearing about how his “handlers” had to feed him information because he isn’t capable of debating on his own without prompting. You’d still be hearing a bunch of bullshit, to be sure, but it would be different bullshit.

    The next time someone on the right tries to deflect or muddy the water with “bUt caN You eVeN giVe a sPecIfic eXampLe AboUt hOw tHe RePubLican party / MAGA / Trump Is seXiSt?”, all you must do is point to the kinds of lies they naturally fell into about Kamala Harris.

    What those higher up in the party think of women, and what the rest have chosen to align themselves to, is on full display.

  • dmention7@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    I am genuinely interested in the line of logic that links “About to become leader of the free world” with "dated Montel Williams in 2001’.

    • candybrie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      This particular one has to be satire. That line. The “some dude” part. The “relentless debate machine.”

  • whenyellowstonehasitsday@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 months ago

    honestly if you’re good enough at fucking to fuck your way into one of the most powerful positions on the planet, while also having some kind of built in ability to go manchurian candidate super-politician if there’s a bluetooth speaker within a 10 foot radius, i think you should have it

    • shastaxc@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      She must be a witch because there’s no way they could be attracted to a black woman… Or maybe she’s really Indian, which is more acceptable

  • Jesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    The earrings obviously told Harris the correct answers about infant murder and pet eating. It’s not fair.

  • howrar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Does anyone think having a Bluetooth set and getting fed the answers is actually a problem? There are so many problems you need to handle as president that I don’t see any possible way for a human being to remember all of it. Just do your thinking offline, write down your reasoning and solutions, and clear your mind for the next thing.

    • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Seems to me, if you could successfully pull this off and not look like an idiot while pausing to listen to instructions, then that’s pretty impressive in itself and shows the kind of skills coordinating and multitasking that you probably want in a president.