Democratic Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib defeated her Republican opponent in Michigan’s 12th congressional district election on Tuesday, securing a fourth term as the only Palestinian-American woman in the US Congress.

The Associated Press called the race with just 18 percent of the votes counted.

Tlaib secured 77 percent of the vote, defeating the Republican Party’s James Hooper who received just 19 percent of the vote.

Her victory comes amid the backdrop of Israel’s war on Gaza, which has killed more than 43,000 Palestinians so far and has been diplomatically and militarily supported by the Biden-Harris administration for more than a year.

Tlaib has been a vocal critic of the war, calling for the US to withhold weapons from Israel. Her opposition to the war on Gaza and support for pro-Palestinian protests on university campuses have drawn harsh criticism from both Republicans and Democrats.

  • the_sisko@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    1 day ago

    Florida’s cannabis legalization ballot measure failed…

    And thanks in part to Michigan voters, we have a president who will fuck over Gaza even more. Great success.

      • the_sisko@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yes? I’m not saying Michigan handed him the election, I’m saying protest votes and no-votes played a big role. We’re fucked due in part to people who say “ooh that will show the DNC”

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      21 hours ago

      The only hope Gaza ever had was the Axis of Resistance, no matter who won they were facing annihilation and forced displacement. North Gaza is the blueprint for the rest of the Strip. Only if Israel is defeated can Palestine be free.

      • the_sisko@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I mean, I do? Trump massively outperformed Harris in swing states, so clearly Harris’s campaign wasn’t able to meet swing state voters where they are. Literally, these were the only people who matter in the US election under the current rules (sadly). Of course Harris swung right, and of course it didn’t work well enough, but not doing it would have been worse…

        I hate politics as much as the next person, but god damn. Recognize the game is what it is, play it as necessary, and then move the needle where you can. Sheesh.

        • Farvana@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          18 hours ago

          “We didn’t go far enough to the right” has been the excuse for decades and it continues to be bullshit. The people telling you the rules of the game are lying to you.

          Leftist domestic policies don’t win leftists, they win centrists, because those policies put money in the pockets of the working class. Improving Medicaid and food stamps, raising the minimum wage, UBI/federal job guarantees, building public housing, expanding unemployment, forgiving student loans, these all win lower and middle class votes.

          Instead of any of this, Kamala and Biden said the economy is great.

    • BakerBagel@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      24 hours ago

      Maybe the ossue was Democrats trying to appeal to Republican voters, who would rather vote for Republicans and get everything they want instead of only some of what they want.

      • the_sisko@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        24 hours ago

        In many elections, that would make sense. But in this election, there was a sizeable group of Nikki Haley Republicans up for grabs, who clearly didn’t want to vote Trump if they could get an alternative. Is there a group of leftists who may have turned out in larger numbers if Harris had swung left? Yeah, maybe. But is that group anywhere near as large as the Haley Republicans, and are they present in swing states? No and no.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          Clearly that failed, and will continue to fail. There is no sich thing as a never Trump Republican because he gives conservatives everything they want. Democrats will continue to lose until they vreak away from Regan style neoliberalism. They need to start offering actual solutions that benefit workers like universal healthcare, returns to pension plans, and housing reforms.

      • Stovetop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        28
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The voters are absolutely responsible for putting Trump into power. Anyone who facilitated that is fully responsible for whatever happens over the next four years.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Democrats are responsible for winning over voters.

          The voters they kicked out at the DNC to make room in their big tent for the Bush administration, AIPAC all their corporate donors.

          Ask those donors why they did not vote for Harris hard enough. Or the Republicans she was wooing over with Liz Cheney.

          • the_sisko@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            19
            ·
            24 hours ago

            One Cheney convert in a swing state is worth a dozen liberals like me in California lol. Swinging right is the rational political move for the leftmost candidate. Swinging left is the rational political move for the rightmost candidate, which is why we saw Trump clumsily try to soften his stance on abortion.

            • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              How many times do you have to be confronted with the absolute, abject failure of that strategy before you start to question it?

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              21
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              24 hours ago

              Which is why the Democrats massively won every swing state.

              A few people in Michigan were not swayed by Liz Cheney. And the Democrats did not want them on stage at the DNC. Alas. Democrats clearly did not need those votes to achieve victory.

              • the_sisko@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                14
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Look, it’s such an exhausting night, and I really do believe that you want to see a better world. I do too.

                I’m just so shattered that we’re looking at four years of chipping away at the rights of women, LGBT, and transgender people. Four years of degrading all the checks and balances against the president. Four years of political retaliations going unchecked. Four years of aggressive anti-climate policy, inhumane border policy, and pandering to a Russia (and now North Korea!) that is also slaughtering innocents in Ukraine. Four years of middle east policy that is at least as bad as Biden/Harris’s, but likely far worse. And four years of slamming our economy with tariffs to “own the Chinese” I guess.

                A vote for Harris was a vote to make things better. Not everything. Good lord she wasn’t the answer to so many major issues facing the US and the world. But it was an objectively better vote, by every metric, than a vote for Trump, or a no-vote. I just can’t argue any more on that.

                • dontgooglefinderscult@lemmings.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  No. It wasn’t.

                  A vote for Harris was to continue the slide towards fascism and bringing genocide home.

                  Trump was that, but faster.

                  Harris’ far right campaign is clearly not what people want.

          • Stovetop@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            21
            ·
            1 day ago

            Doesn’t change what I said, though. Trump won because the average voter wants fascism.

            • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Unless you are willing to criticize the Democrats they will not change this losing strategy. Admit they ran an awful campaign and push them to run on good policies next time.

              • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I am willing to criticize the Democrats. There’s a lot I would have done differently.

                But Jesus himself could descend from heaven preaching love for mankind and the American people would still vote for Trump instead.

                The average American voter wants fascism, it’s as simple as that.

                • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  22
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Comparing Kamala Harris to Jesus while she is facilitating a genocide… Really shows how much of a cult the Democratic party has become.

                  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    11
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    That’s a misreading of analogy.

                    Let me put it this way. I am a leftist. I believe strongly in fielding more left-leaning candidates. However, I accept I am the political minority. A leftist administration could be the exact thing needed to fix everything that is wrong with the United States, but they would never win an election because the support just isn’t there.

                    Americans don’t want leftists, fascism is an easier sell.

    • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Short of putting boots on the ground or dropping a nuke there is no way to “fuck over Gaza even more.”

      • the_sisko@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        The one thing I’ve learned from experience w/ Donald Trump is that he finds a way to make things worse.

        • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That’s a very broad statement that I can’t argue with because I have no intention to defend Donald Trump. Wiith that in mind I imagine anything he does to Gaza is just in line with what Biden or Harris would have also done but probably dumber. They had over a year to make us believe otherwise.

          • the_sisko@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 day ago

            So then the logic here is “vote for a candidate who is at least as bad for Gaza, but will also fuck up the rest of the world”. Or “don’t vote for the candidate who will be obviously less damaging for the rest of the world, even though my action won’t help Gaza at all”.

            Even if you assume Harris would have been just as bad for Gaza… I mean it’s patently clear that the only choice is to vote for the lesser of two evils and then raise hell that you need better policies from them.

              • jonne@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                The only potential silver lining is the end of the American Empire. They already pushed BRICS into dedollarisation, and another 4 years of Trump will hopefully cause the EU to finally go their own way too.

                Then again, this was already going to happen anyway and I would’ve rather seen someone sane manage this decline instead of Trump.