• RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 days ago

    Because his billions were earned from offering an actually decent service beholden to the customers rather than the shareholders, something not many other billionaires seem capable of. Yeah, nobody needs a billion dollars but literally everyone else in the gaming industry would rather shoot themselves in the foot to make a penny now rather than… Just simply not do that and make a dollar later.

    • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      You cannot possibly earn a billion dollars. That money is the excess labor value of Valve workers. In the context of how our society is currently structured Gaben certainly isn’t the worst of them, but he’s still a member of the parasite class.

        • Moah@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          Hmm it was at some point, and then there were reports it’s not that amazing if you’re not part of the “in” crowd.

        • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 days ago

          I’ve heard that, yes, but that doesn’t change the fact that the relationship Gaben has with Valve workers is inherently parasitic. He may be a “good boss,” but he’s still their boss, has ownership of all their work, and could fire them at will.

          • tmyakal@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            Also worth noting that most of Gabe’s (and Valve’s) value is not based on anyone at Valve’s work, but instead based on taking a cut from every dev that sells on Steam. Valve is effectively a landlord renting out digital real estate. The fact that they’re able to make obscene amounts of money suggests to me that maybe rents are too damn high.

            • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              4 days ago

              That’s a good point, it’s an interesting social phenomenon that people tend to be fond of Valve in spite of this because they’re seen as good stewards of the space. It’s like having a landlord that takes good care of the property and makes regular improvements. The property relations are still exploitative, but they’re doing better than most others would within that exploitative framework.

      • AnyOldName3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        Most of Valve’s money comes from taking a 30% cut of all sales through the Steam store, which is a lot of money. They’re not abusing their market position as much as they could (e.g. if you buy a Steam key from anywhere else, like a key in a physical box at a physical store, or another online key retailer like Humble Bundle, Valve gets no money, as the publisher can generate as many Steam keys as they want for free), but it’s the surplus value of the labour of employees of other companies that Gabe Newell accumulates.

      • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        Every other game company does that, too, ON TOP of all the other shit they do.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      5 days ago

      literally everyone else in the gaming industry would rather shoot themselves in the foot to make a penny now rather than… Just simply not do that and make a dollar later.

      Ah, the shortsighted joy of publicly traded companies.