• Lauchs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sorry, missed this amongst a few less knowledgeable replies.

    Generally, I understand the Arab states as the aggressor in that.

    The Israeli attack was a first strike but happened with multiple armies deployed along its borders.

    It’s been awhile since I read about that war but my memory is that someone (Egypt?) cut off a Israel’s access to a major maritime route. Israel reiterated its decade long position that such an act was grounds for war. In other words saying “if you do this, we consider a war to have begun.”

    The Arab states deploy troops and units along multiple Israeli borders. A quick look at total troops available to the new Arab defence pact suggest they outmanned Israel’s by almost 2:1, with more than 2:1 and 3:1 advantage in aircraft and tanks respectively. (I admittedly I have no memory of quality of those forces.)

    The destruction of the Egyptian airforce is pretty famous in military history and based on those facts, I’ve always felt the Arab states as the aggressor in that one.

    What parts or acts, other than the act of existing, am I ignorant of or misremembering that make Israel the aggressor?