• zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          34
          ·
          1 年前

          The cookie law isn’t dumb, but at this point it should maybe be reformed. Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required. Instead of complaining about the cookie banner law, people should complain about websites who sell their users’ data.

          • denshi@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            1 年前

            Basically as long as a website doesn’t do shady shit with cookies no cookie banner is required.

            That is actually the status quo. If a website only uses cookies that are needed to make the website function, there is no need for a banner or dialogue. These cookie banners are there deliberately to be annoying so you’ll agree to more than is necessary.

          • jarfil@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 年前

            The newest take on cookies, is “accept all, or pay to read”. Quite shady, if you ask me.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 年前

            The dumb bit of the law is the fact that websites are allowed to put up an annoying banner that says either accept cookies or individually deselect 240 checkboxes.