Summary

The IRS anticipates a $500 billion revenue loss as taxpayers increasingly skip filings following cuts from Elon Musk under Trump.

The IRS, set to downsize by 20% by May 15, has seen increased online chatter about avoiding taxes, with individuals betting auditors won’t scrutinize accounts.

Experts warned that workforce reductions could cripple the agency’s efficiency.

Treasury officials predict a 10% drop in tax receipts compared to 2024.

Former IRS commissioners have criticized the cuts, warning of dysfunction and reduced collection capacity.

  • naught101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    That’s just an argument that the military budget should be dramatically reduced (absolutely agree!), not that taxation is a problem in general.

    • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      6 days ago

      Can’t fund the military without taxation. If you told citizens to donate to support a war effort halfway across the globe that has no impact on their daily lives, they’d be absolutely certain to do it. /s. Now, coerce them with the threat of being thrown in a cage, or at the barrel of a gun, and that’s different.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        Yes, but you CAN have taxation without funding the military. You’re throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

        I don’t think taxation is the only way to do this, but you do need some kind of process for ensuring common social services and infrastructure exist and are maintained. Taxation is what we have now. How would you support those services without it?

        • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          If you absolutely must have taxation, then have state taxation. Because I don’t see the state of Texas declaring war on Pakistan.

          • naught101@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            6 days ago

            How would you fund federal services?

            Seems to me the problem isn’t taxation, it’s the process for deciding how that government spending is distributed…

            • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              6 days ago

              You can’t fix that problem. The fact that there is a big pile of money there means that greedy people will attempt to get their hands on it. No matter what. So the only way to fix that is to not have the big pile of money sitting there to begin with.

              • naught101@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 days ago

                So… you think that: a) you can’t change the way government spends money, but b) you can change the way government receives money?

                That’s an interesting world view.

                  • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    6 days ago

                    Get off the internet, it was started because of government funding. Don’t drive on roads, government funding. Don’t use gas or a car, or helmets or drink water, or take any medicine. You can’t wear clothes you didn’t make yourself, don’t live in a house that was built to code. Forget gfic outlets. Electronics that meet safety regs? Get rid of them. You better not have an up to date Electrical box either. Food safety? More government overreach funded by taxes. Those wastages.