After just seeing so many articles of people being sad I really just have to say the pope was an asshole. You don’t even have to do good research to see that this guy and his administration was still hiding pedophiles, hating gay people, and generally being a jerk all while pretending he was better than everyone else. The only thing he did was say he loved everyone and be a nice guy on camera which literally anyone could pretend to do. Meanwhile his administration was just more of the same shit. Just creating some counterpoint to the nonsense narrative I keep seeing.

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 hours ago

    The catholic church… any organized religion really is a force for conservatism, tradition, dogmatism and superstition.

    You will NEVER see a pope who aligns with modern, secular, humanist morals and ethics, because such a person would never rise to power in a monarchical, absolutist structure build on hierarchy, dogmatism and obedience.

    In my opinion, no pope will ever be not an asshole.

    But you can absolutely be a HUGE asshole like Joseph Alois Ratzinger (Benedict XVI) (Fuck the Motherfucker), or you can be a somewhat less bad asshole like Jorge Mario Bergoglio (Francis). But even if this one produces less shit than the other, it’s still a huge asshole producing lots of shit.

    So please don’t underestimate the amount of shit this asshole produced!

    Francis scored points in the Evangelical camp not only by dispensing with traditional Catholic pomp (such as the red velvet shoes), but also by implementing the Evangelicals’ political agenda. Hardly any other pope has supported the worldwide campaigns against abortion as massively as he has, and hardly any pope has done so little against the massive attacks on gays, lesbians and trans people from within his own ranks. When, for example, the Nigerian Bishops’ Conference called for even harsher punishments for homosexuals, no substantial criticism was heard from Rome. All in all, Francis was not an “advocate of humanity”, but rather a sympathetic, smiling face that concealed a deeply inhuman ideology. He was a wolf in sheep’s clothing.

    source

    Instead of clearly naming the aggressor, Francis called on Ukraine to “show the white flag” as an expression of willingness to negotiate - a call that was understood in Kiev as an invitation to surrender. The fact that he repeatedly avoided directly naming Vladimir Putin as the person responsible for the suffering, but instead spoke of a “drama on both sides”, called his moral judgment into question and damaged his credibility as an advocate for peace and justice.

    source

    His response to the islamic attacks on Charlie Hebdo:

    “If a dear friend speaks badly of my mother, he can expect a punch, and that’s normal. […] You shouldn’t provoke the faith of others.”

    His position towards abortion:

    “like hiring a contract killer to solve a problem”

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You seem to follow him very closely, for someone you don’t like.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Know your enemy?

        I know a lot about Musk, Trump, Thiel, Sacks, RFK, etc.

        • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          5 hours ago

          “your enemy” bro, who hurt you? Like what are you even taking about. It’s the Pope bro.

      • Enkrod@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        As a militant anti-theist I have informed myself about the most influential theist on earth. He was heading the most influential, superstitious, conservative, dogmatic organisation in the world and his views and speeches still shape policy in my country and the union of countries it exists in. Where I have to suffer under or combat every policy idea the people influenced by him impose on me, as I hold views diametrically opposed to his. Keeping myself and those around me informed about the hollowness of the public image of these enemies of modernity is one of the few ways to fight back against theist feel-good propaganda.

        How you think I could have done otherwise is beyond me.

        It seems to me like saying people should ignore bad actors instead of actively opposing them.

        • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “militant anti theist” I think the world you’re looking for si “fanatic atheists” bro lmao, I’m sure that’s what your call ‘militant theists’.