• 96ToyotaCamry@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    What “illegal immigrants” in their right mind would be out partying at an after hours night club with everything going on? I wouldn’t be surprised if there were a few, but 100? This reeks of steamed hams. 100 migrants localized entirely in this illegal nightclub, in this political climate? I would like to see the evidence

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They probably weren’t out partying carrying their birth certificate on them. At this stage you’re probably considered illegal if you can’t prove your citizenship right then and there.

      • j0ester@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        Even if you have evidence, ICE will just say, “take them anyway! They don’t look white.”

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        19
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Was no longer a thing a long time ago

        Democrats and Republicans both worked hard for the elites to make sure of it

        • neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          37 seconds ago

          Don’t you dare both sides this horse shit we’re dealing with. Only one side caused it and continues to support it. And you know that you little traitor.

  • Hikuro-93@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    If it’s illegal and all that, yes, they should be held to standard.

    But given the fact that this administration likes to slap the word “illegal” on anything they don’t like, was it really? Or is it a boy crying wolf again?

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 hours ago

      If it’s illegal and all that, yes, they should be held to standard.

      The past few years have eroded the meaning of illegal, and even standards. They have even chose to ignore due process.

      • Hikuro-93@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        56 minutes ago

        Who said they should be deported? And if they are indeed commiting an illegal act under the written law, why shouldn’t they be subject to any consequences for breaking said law?

        I don’t agree with authoritarianism, but I won’t defend lawlessness either. These extreme and radical stances from either party are why the US is where it currently is.

        I cast my doubt over the the very foundation of the act of imprisoning these people, not if they’re innocent or not. Because without due process everyone is guilty until proven otherwise - and even then not really. I think you missed my entire point.

          • Hikuro-93@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 minutes ago

            I wouldn’t call them “left stances” per say, as it’s something the right also tends to do. Especially when comparing it to the current administration, which despite expecting it to be bad, I certainly didn’t expect it to be this unprecedentally bad.

            What I mean, mostly, is that if “you” want people to stand by you showing why the other side sucks isn’t nearly enough. The people already know the other side sucks - they want something better, not more of the same but with a different coat of paint. Unless you can convince the people you are better than the other options, badmouthing the opposition won’t do much to people who’ve seen this play out a thousand times before.

            Why was Trump elected (and note, I’m not entirely convince he actually was, but that’s another whole discussion)? Biden wasn’t doing anything nearly as outlandish as this administration is doing, but they were still concealing Biden’s mental state when it was obvious to most. Harris made sure to make her campaign pure spectacle and fanfare through celebrities and huge amounts of spending, focusing way more on appearance than on substance, while the people craved better living conditions overall. And regardless of the obvious answer, what did Trump run his campaign on? Precisely what the people were desperate to hear, even if they knew coming from him it might be bs (which everyone sees it actually was all along).

            This is not just a political issue, but a cultural one as well. People don’t vote for policies, they vote for colors, for their preferred celebrities, and for whoever can throw the flashiest party - and on that regard allow me a bit of hippocrisy, as in my country it’s not that different, even if we do have more parties to choose from (I.e., what I’m saying isn’t valid just for the US, but for many more so-called democratic nations, which irks me to the bone). In practical terms there isn’t even any other option available because people won’t even consider them. And on that department as long as mentalities don’t change, neither will the system. And after years of this tug war by both sides pulling to themselves while badmouthing the other, one of them decided it was time to solve this impasse once and for all, by any means necessary.

            The current administration, even if Trump kicks the bucket midway, is clearly not planning to leave unless forced through sweat and blood. Otherwise they wouldn’t go to so much trouble and not care about their unpopularity when someone else can just come later and undo everything they did. Of course the problem runs deeper than this already long text, but if discussed at lenght this would make a book.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          We know it’s a bad situation when the basic elements of the constitution are considered “extreme and radical”

          No person shall … be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.

          • Hikuro-93@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            19 seconds ago

            I think you should re-read. I didn’t say due process was “extreme and radical”. You’re reading what you want to read and trying to polarize and derail this discussion, like the other commenter.

            Just to state this will be my last reply to this sort of reply, since there’s no discussion to be had with people who had their minds set on blind hate before even entering, which, ironically, is a rather radical stance to have by itself. I know you won’t believe it and try to distort it to suit your internal frutration, but I’m on your side. Cheers.

  • gedaliyah@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Colorado was one of the states that has been very actively fighting Trump’s goons. It’ll be interesting to see how this turns out.

  • ToastedRavioli@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Pullen estimated more than 200 people were inside the nightclub. Also among those detained were a dozen active-duty military members who either were patrons or working as armed security. Some patrons were arrested on undisclosed outstanding warrants, Pullen said.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s just an average night club. You got college kids, people doing cocaine, tech bros, tourists.