• LesserAbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Listen, “comms” is a terrible name for this concept. I’m calling them subs until something better comes along.

    • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Lol how so, Lemmy (the software) calls them “communities” and comms is a nice and shortened version of that

      • LesserAbe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I’m not saying subs is perfect. But comms has a much more predominant existing meaning: “communications.” It’s not clear what you’re referring to. While “sub” does have some existing meanings like “subscription” or “submissive,” those aren’t as pervasive meanings, and in my mental map it’s more associated with a subreddit or Lemmy community, so that’s what I’m going with.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Both of those words (community and comms) have common meanings that are adjacent but distinct in important ways from the Lemmy jargon meaning. That makes them confusing and awkward to use; what if you want to talk about the Lemmy community at large or some subset of it? You would have to go way out of your way to make sure all ambiguity is removed that you might be talking about a “community” as in the subreddit equivalent. Comms is not as bad in this way I guess.

      • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        That’s exactly why, actually. It’s too easy, like a kid naming their dog Mr. Woofs or naming a car Sally. I feel we can be far more creative.

        I can’t, but I’m sure someone can.