Nearly two in five Democratic-leaning voters would consider joining a non-Musk-led third party.

  • Almacca@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    An actual worker’s party would be good, but you won’t get that from Musk.

    That photo of Musk looks like he’s a follower of Dagon and is transforming into a fish-creature.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      This. With our current system we can’t get a third party winning without the republicans becoming a vastly minority party at all levels. Anything like rank choice changes the game.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      As always: Ranked Choice is a specific use of ranked ballots, and it kinda sucks. You want a Condorcet method like Ranked Pairs.

      Say an election goes like this:

      40% vote A > B > C.
      35% vote C > B > A.
      25% vote B > C > A.

      Plurality says A wins, because Plurality sucks. You don’t even need a bare majority. You just need everybody else to split up.

      RCV says C wins: B has the fewest top votes, so they’re eliminated. The race becomes 40% A > C versus 60% C > A. Better… but still wrong, because 65% of people would prefer B > C.

      Condorcet methods like Ranked Pairs get that right. They model every runoff: A vs B is 40-60, A vs C is 40-60, B vs C is 65-35. B wins every 1v1 and is obviously the best candidate according to these voters. The supermajority prefers B.

      And of course Approval Voting is just letting people check multiple names, and it somehow matches Condorcet results when enough people vote. Because you are unique… just like everybody else.

  • SinningStromgald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 day ago

    If someone like AOC or Mamdani ran third party for the, theoretical, next presidential election I would vote for them. Since any third party candidate I would vote for would be unlikely to get large corporate/billionaire donations they should start campaigning now so they have time to build up a grassroots machine to get their message and name out there.

    • Baron Von J@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Perot received almost 20% of the national popular vote in 1992 and don’t win a single electoral vote. There hasn’t been a single electoral vote to a 3rd party presidential candidate since 1968. It would take some unbelievably consistent polling showing a massive margin of victory to convince me a 3rd party can win at the state or federal level as long as we have first-past-the-post.

    • Eldritch@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s your vote. And honestly, presidential elections are meaningless beyond keeping Republicans out currently.

      I would much rather see AOC or Mamdami focus on helping to build other state legislatures up as allies. That would be the best way to actually get things done. So much effort is wasted on the presidency. And not spent in the legislature, which is where the fascists have gotten most of their victories from.