• themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s difficult to avoid nihilism neck deep into an apocalypse. But you’re right, I was being glib and dismissive. Sorry about that.

    The reason I objected in the first place is that the oligarchy has used the personal choices conversation to quash criticisms across the board, and it’s extremely effective. You can’t complain about American manufacturing jobs going overseas because you drive an imported car. You can’t complain about slave labor because you buy Nikes or KitKats or strawberries picked by illegal immigrants. It’s a thought-terminating purity test that doesn’t even hold up to scrutiny.

    Factory farming chickens (or pigs or fish or reduces carbon output, but comes with its own environmental horrors, like diseases, water contamination, pest control, etc. Everyone in the world could go full vegan tomorrow, and the oligarchy would be clear cutting the Amazon rainforest to plant soybeans and lentils the day after, because the problem has never been personal choices. We need systemic changes to fix systemic problems.

    By all means, reduce your beef consumption. But if you want to actually reduce human-drive climate destruction, we need to start eating billionaires, not chickens.

    • Naich@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes, you are totally correct in all that, but I’m coming from a personal perspective - self preservation in what seems like a hopeless situation. Yes, it’s all fucked and don’t stop trying to eat the billionaires, but if you can not play their game, even in a minor way, that is a small win for you personally. Not dancing to their tune is a better feeling than hopeless nihilism as you bite into another one of their burgers, giving them a little bit more money and power.

      And if enough people did that, who knows - it might actually make a difference.