But also… … …do they?
Genetics makes it likely, but not assured.
If genetics can’t be consistent, it should be abolished.
Yes we do.
When the fuck did you compare? Uh, wording, but whatever.
Oops, I forgot my twin knows my username.
On the plus side, I have a follower!
I would conjecture at least weekly to ensure parity. If anyone is slightly longer they could raise the weekly wanking quotient (WWQ, for the medical professionals in the audience) by 10-20% until the discrepancy is resolved.
This is like when RedBan asked some stupid ass question and Tony rides him for it and then pauses, looks at the bucket pull and repeats the question.
Yeah but is your dick bigger than her putty is deep.
Think majorasterriblefate, think!
same energy
Bad women’s anatomy
Interesting question. I knew two twin sisters and they didn’t have the same boob type.
So they did not have twin peaks?
Get out
…of my dreams, and into my car!!!
not after one decided to become the log lady
Yeah, but did they have same size dicks? /s
So the twins didn’t have twin twins, eh?
It’s true, this is a well-documented phenomenon:
Were they otherwise identical? Or?
The twins? Yes. The type when we meet the first time we can’t differentiate. But one had more torpedo boobs with puffy nipples and the other, not.
Please share you data acquisition methods with the rest of the class
Nah, nothing worth saying. They had a third sister, which I dated for a while. You don’t need much to notice boobs. We went to their summer house and, before sleeping, they were not using bras. That’s it. Another time, I learned they also didn’t shave the same way down there, but this was just booze and giggles.
Next time just lie.
Did you compare them side by side?
Yeah, artist should’ve added “identical” in there. I went to school with a pair of twins, like even had the same fucking first name, but they could not be further apart. Like one became big finance bro and is tall, the other is a very well regarded tattoo artist and is not tall at all.
Wait a second! You’re telling me that twins had the same first name?? WTF? Why? That doesn’t make any sense
I know of twins named Brittany and Brittney. Their parents are idiots.
Weird parents I suppose? It was strange in elementary, but they started going by their middle names in high school
Probably not if one of them is a woman.
This one, ladies and gentlemen.
Women can have dicks. Dick having people can call themselves women.
…and vice-versa.
I’ve personally been with ‘at least’ two “women”, who not only had bazookas, but also equally impressive groin-ferret, that made me happy and cry at the same time.
On second thought, it is very much possible, one of male twins might just realise he is a she but refuses for any down-surgery. Totally possible. We have to be open minded.Not the punchline I wanted, but perhaps the one we all needed. Perhaps.
(I still prefer the original punchline)
Interestingly enough, my language has a word for gender-specific twin pairs (ie. dvīņubrāļi would be twin brothers), but not really when twins are different gender
Or both.
How come no matter what color the shampoo is the lather is always white??
Ooh, I like this one! I think it’s for the same reason that liquids like egg whites, sea water, and even some broths can be clear when at rest but opaque when frothy. And the reason for that is the same as the reason why a straw in a glass of still water looks like it’s broken: refraction!
So, when light enters or leaves a medium at an angle, it is bent by the transition between the medium it’s entering and what it’s leaving. And it’s not a lossless process; some of the light that reaches the boundary is reflected instead by the medium, some is reflected internally, and some is absorbed by the medium.
With a single large bubble, you wouldn’t notice this; the boundary is tiny, there’s way more of one medium (air) than the other (soap), and the bubble’s shape means that the light actually tends to bend back to its original trajectory again coming out. But if there are many, many thousands of tiny bubbles, with pretty similar amounts of soap and air, some sharing boundary layers so that light can enter and leave at different angles, reflecting light all over the place and refracting it from everywhere, you’re just going to get that reflected mess.
And even if the soap is dyed, that wimpy little amount of dye isn’t filtering the color of the light enough for it to overwhelm the combined color of all the other light in the room; which, in most cases, basically average out to white.
Because you’re always using the shampoo for the same thing, perv.
oh i know exactly where you’re leading with these questions and i am not playing mr hilter.
Its shampoo cum.
hire that guy! he thinks outside the box
What cruel trick to be identical in every way but that!
not necessarily
It’s 50/50
I dont know and I’m not screwing my search history with this but I think they’d have very similar members.
Fuck I never thought of that…
these eyes are super unsettling
It might depend on their diet.
Nature vs nurture, I guess?
Specifically what about their diet? Please I need an answer.
I was just spitballin…
no, we don’t
I’m sorry but if you’re going to respond we need to know is the differential large or ?
I think that identical twins should probably have about the same size. It’d make sense at least.
Man, could you imagine science stopping at it makes sense, so why would we test it? Where would this world be if that was the mentality of inventors and scientists?
It’s useful to start with a hypothesis though
That girl in the middle knows the answer and won’t tell.
