• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You can’t, and shouldn’t try. Spending time in moderation is more important, so limit that. Sure when they’re little you have to open restrictions over time but keep the focus on recognizing ai slop and understanding the issues with it.

    Sooner than you think, they’re watching is out of your control so it quickly becomes critical for them learn about

  • freijon@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You could try the app “Slop detective”. It’s an iOS / Android app developed for kids to learn to detect AI slop. Alternatively, you can simply open slopdetective.kagi.com if you don’t want to install anything. It’s created by kagi.com, the company behind the search engine. They have several initiatives to fight AI slop, this educational app being one of them.

  • Jhuskindle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I am a very progressive parent. I was harassed by my parents for spending too much time on the computer and I make 6 figures working in tech now and spend 8 hours a day minimum on the computer. When I say I’m progressive I’m not exaggerating. Robotics are the future of humanity. Understanding tech is the future 6 figure job my kid will have. First and foremost I pay for YT premium to avoid the constant barrage of unreviewed ads. Secondly I take a night every week to go through her watch history and remove some videos that are questionable for the algorithm. I also block channels in the suggested area and block watched makers if they are slop or … bad…

    I also tell her she is allowed to watch shorts but ONLY if she is able to watch longer form content above all. I do not believe in tik tok and that started way before trumps cronies owned it. I believe tik tok type consumption is one of those things that will come in a fad and ease out of fad.

    I also watch sometimes with her to identify Ai slop and I show her videos if I ever fall for Ai. I got really excited about a fox video the other day that turned out to be ai and I showed her and she recognized the Ai tells before I did.

    This allows a kid to explore technology without pressure or fear but avoids the Ai stuff. I also have her lookup facts if I know them to be wrong. We watch a lot of dar man because its child friendly but boy fact checking those videos are a riot.

    She is very smart so I rarely have to do anything now but she started yt back when those creepy vilent Elsa videos were popular. So I have been using this method for 6 years. She is a tech wiz, she is smart, made high honor roll, her focus is still intact and she does well at school.

    This was also important to me. I also noticed some channels which were satire of middle schoolers would influence her behavior, so we talk about it. Then if the behavior continues ues I block the channel. Later she can watch again if she feels she is strong minded enough. Some weird pov YouTube rs were cut off for a year but have been allowed back as she is not pliable in those ways anymore.

    Anyways thats the most serious and in depth answer. I hate to pay for YouTube but its the best way to keep her on a single platform with the most visibility and I can adjust the algorithm through her history

    • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      You can limit shorts in the YouTube parental settings! Just found out about this a few weeks ago

      You can’t disable them completely, but you can set a time limit

    • TheSambassador@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      You sound like a great parent, and this should ideally be how every parent teaches their kids. Trust, open discussion, and a welcoming environment for questions.

  • protist@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    ·
    2 days ago

    My son is still young, almost 8, so I’m speaking for near that age level. He doesn’t get unrestricted access to YouTube. If he’s watching YouTube, it’s with one of us present and helping him navigate it. He always wants to watch the video that’s the lowest quality shit just based on the thumbnail, because they have thumbnails that stick out. I’ve taught him about “low quality” content and we’ve watched a couple so he could understand what I meant. Now, when he wants to watch something like that, I say “no, that’s going to be low quality,” he seems to understand and we move on to find something else.

    Eventually, I’m going to let him navigate YouTube alone sometimes, and then go back and look at his watch history to see how things are going. He doesn’t know watch history is a thing, nor will I ever tell him. If things go off the rails, we will guide them back to the rails slowly and nonjudgmentally

    That said, we were at a restaurant the other day and a woman was there with her baby and a friend. She set that infant in a high chair with AI slop on her phone right in its face. The kid definitely didn’t disturb her conversation, because it looked like a zombie. Godspeed, child

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      2 days ago

      Remember that watch history has the largest impact on what recommended videos will appear in his feed.

      Curating the watch history is insanely effective, I have done it for a decade and it has helped me keep my feed 92% politics free, and 98% toxic masculinity free, I never knew about Tate until I started seeing reddit posts about what a terrible person he is.

      I would actually show him this when he is old enough.

      My strategy about this was to remove any content I don’t specifically want recommendations from, but has shifted to a more permissive stance where I will focus on removing videos that specifically harms my recommendations.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 days ago

        Definitely the case! I’m not always on top of this myself, but I do go in and remove anything that may poison my recommendations. At this point, I just get plants, history, and a splash of comedy. Thank you for bringing this to the fore!

    • FoolsQuartz@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’ve taught him about “low quality” content and we’ve watched a couple so he could understand what I meant. Now, when he wants to watch something like that, I say “no, that’s going to be low quality,” he seems to understand and we move on to find something else.

      Honestly never thought about how I would teach my (hypothetical, future) kid this stuff. I have the benefit of a decade of experience learning how youtube works and living through the clickbait endemic.
      I guess that’s why it’s so important for parents to navigate YouTube together with them. My first experience of YT was also watching cool stuff like VSauce and Lego animations with my family.

      That said, we were at a restaurant the other day and a woman was there with her baby and a friend. She set that infant in a high chair with AI slop on her phone right in its face. The kid definitely didn’t disturb her conversation, because it looked like a zombie. Godspeed, child

      Sometimes you see toddlers who are just playing blaring loud noises from tablets at restaurants. You also see adults&teenagers doing that on trains… I guess I would point them out to my kid afterwards and say “that’s what happens when you watch too mcuh brainrot!”

    • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      He always wants to watch the video that’s the lowest quality shit just based on the thumbnail, because they have thumbnails that stick out.

      There’s an add-on by the same guy who makes sponsorbock that replaces thumbnails (and video tittles) for more more accurate ones, maybe you want to try that.

      (Disclaimer: The add-on itself is free software (as in freedom) but the developer added the restriction that after one hour trial you can either pay or wait 24h and then you can use it without restriction. It’s an interesting model.)

    • Rhaedas@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is good parenting. You can’t always be there to guide them or restrict them, nor should you want to be. You instead help them understand how to navigate the world themselves smartly. This is true for anything, not just what they see on the internet.

    • jenesaisquoi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      That said, we were at a restaurant the other day and a woman was there with her baby and a friend. She set that infant in a high chair with AI slop on her phone right in its face. The kid definitely didn’t disturb her conversation, because it looked like a zombie.

      This should be illegal, because it is harming the child. It should be viewed the same as giving it alcohol to keep it quiet.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m yet to encounter this really, my kids (twins) are only 2. However, this is the answer as I understand it - limit access in terms of time and content, and relax those limitations as appropriate.

      That said, I’m going to struggle. Everyone needs to find the right balance for their own home, but I suspect I will lean more towards allowing less access to more curated content than most parents. I just can’t abide the kind of brain rotting content that’s available. I can’t stand advertising of any kind. I know this will make me unpopular - or less “cool” than other parents, but I’m hoping that I can make up for it in other ways.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        PBS Kids is a great option for littles! Free, no commercials, and supportive of social/emotional development (Reminder to set up a monthly donation to your local PBS station!). With the PBS Kids app, we’d often download a few episodes of something like Daniel Tiger or Wild Kratts for road trips

        We rarely watch YouTube together, most of the time he’s watching a series of some kind through Netflix or Paramount. Trollhunters, Gravity Falls, Henry Danger, stuff like that. His only exposure to commercials is during football games, whereas I can still sing over 100 jingles from my childhood.

        It’s still always better to limit/avoid screentime…

        • fizzle@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yeah this is going to be part of my strategy.

          Increased availability of better quality content, less reliance on algorithms serving up the next thing.

    • Meron35@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Look into DeArrow (by same creators of SponsorBlock), which offers crowdsourced “de-clickbaited” video titles and thumbnails.

      • copygirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        While it’s nice to just avoid the clickbait while enjoying potentially genuinely good videos, I ended up uninstalling the extension. I want to explicitly avoid clickbait, and focus on encouraging and supporting creators that don’t use it. Also, if I end up unknowingly interacting with too many clickbait-y videos, I worry the algorithm will push me more of that.

        • Meron35@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          Unfortunately this is an increasingly unviable strategy, because even “good” creators have started using clickbaity titles and thumbnails, even if their content has remained the same. Some have even retroactively changed the titles/thumbnails of their older videos to this style.

          Clickbait is engineered by behavioural scientists to be as addictive as possible, and has been proven to trigger similar neural pathways to other addictions, such as drug or gambling.

          Basically every creator with a shred of self awareness has admitted that they hate creating clickbait thumbnails, titles, and phrases like smash that like button and subscribe; they end up doing it anyway because A/B testing with randomised thumbnails and titles clearly show that they work.

          The live A/B testing in particular obscures whether a creator employs clickbait or not - you may be under the impression that a certain creator has remained principled, when in reality you were just allocated to the control group by chance.

          I feel that it’s one of those situations where the game is rigged, and the only way to “win” is to change the rules yourself.

    • gedaliyah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Unpopular opinion: I have a second phone logged into my kid’s YT account. I train the algorithm while he’s sleeping.

      It takes a significant time, and YouTube doesn’t have good options for blocking content, but it helps keep out the worst of the brainrot.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 day ago

    Only whitelist content or creators you personally have vetted with apps like YouTube kids, jellyfin, etc until you can trust their own decision making. Then share an account so that you can see watch history (and hopefully your good media choices influenced their tastes as you would share an algorithm)

  • IWW4@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    You can’t and any attempt to do so will only entice them.

    • ComfortableRaspberry@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 day ago

      No reason to downvote this comment. You can’t keep your kids away from everything you think is harmful. It’s also not good for them, because even if you manage to do so, they won’t be able to properly handle it, when they’re grown up.

      Explain to them what is what, what aspects about it are harmful and how to recognize if something was generated with AI or not.

      Parenting isn’t about shielding your kids from everything you think is bad for them, but about preparing them to handle real life and it’s challenges.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I agree that if you completely take away their agency that it only makes the slop look more attractive but I also disagree that sentiment that “you can’t”. Technically it’s true. But that doesn’t mean we ought to give in to slop as parents. Low effort slop has been around since before AI. Find ways to teach the importance of genuine creative content and cultivate a preference for the real creative works with your children.

      • IWW4@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        In the narrow context of AI slop images it just such a nothing issue. There are so many insanely hard challenges to parenting that worry about you kid seeing shitty art isnt one of them.

        You disagree with the sentiment that you can’t. LMAO how to tell me you have never revised a kid without telling me you have never raised a kid.

  • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    (disclaimer: I’m not a parent, so this is just what I think I would do with a hypothetical child)

    How old is the said kid? If 5 or older, I’d have a talk with them about the following points: 1. what generative AI is, 2. why it’s bad/why I don’t want them to watch slop, and 3. how to recognise it, all adjusted so that a kid can grasp those things.

    Another thing is to make sure they don’t spend all or most of their time on screens, but instead ensure that they have the resources and attention to do normal, screenless kid things.

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t, I don’t gatekeep their entertainment. I do critically discuss the content with them though.

    IMHO it’s more important to teach them to critically analyse what they consume.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I just talk through it with them. Get them to think about who made it, why they made it, what’s it saying, where was it made, who is it made for, how theyfound it, what they thought of it, which situations it would be appropriate… and picking it apart.

  • CubitOom@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    First, help them discover real connections, with their friends, family, volunteer work, or even work with animals.

    Introduce them to good content; art, music, plays, poetry, novels, film, video games, etc. that actually make them feel or discover something.

    Help them to think critically about the media they consume and they won’t want entertainment to zone out to, but something that they can actually enrich themselfs with.

  • FunkyCheese@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    My kid doesnt have internet access

    As in, his pc in his room has no internet

    When he plays online in the living room he isnt allowed to go to the browser unless i am there to tell him what to type or which site to go on

    And he has no smartphone etc, just a dumb ass nokia

    My kid is 11

  • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Hard restrictions of devices based on age. No smartphones or tablets until high school. No social media until 16.

    Lots of activities.

    • LwL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Great way to make sure your kid gets bullied and socially excluded, resulting in lifelong trauma. Not to mention that they will then start using the internet with the media literacy of an average 70 year old and fall for everything they should’ve learned with parental guidance at a young age.

      • StinkyFingerItchyBum@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Well, the oldest is 14 has no bullying, went to the worlds for robotics and has a great group of friends. So maybe your fears are just your fears.

        Edit: they have technology, but using a laptop during specific times has little to none of the dopamine hacking mobiles give, yet all the communication and information required.

  • infinitevalence@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t allow unsupervised watching of YouTube and all other platforms are forbidden.

    Their computers are in a public space where I can see what they are doing and watching.

    I also do not allow screens in their bedrooms the occasional exception being for homework not only if they can’t get it done in a common room.

  • brunchyvirus@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just to like the radio, television, internet, etc…AI slip is here to stay, it might die down, but the cats out of the bag. I would take the same steps you would regular parental controls for tv/phone/internet if you’re concerned.

    Secondly and more importantly you should be teaching your kids critical thinking skills and not to believe everything they see or hear…just like that old quote

    “Believe half of what you see and nothing of what you hear.”

    The reason I say that is regardless of what you think of AI, it’s good enough now to where you can grab a few minutes sound bite of someone from Facebook or YouTube and be able to imitate there voice.

    This generation is going to have to be much more viligant not just about spam emails, but audio and video calls imitaing a manger or a significant other…it’s going to be very interesting