Can “it doesn’t matter” exist on a moral spectrum? I guess if you had an “objective moral framework” that has a tertiary category for “morally neutral” then can it morally judge one rock crushing another as “neutral” / “not my jurisdiction”?
oh, and if we had that framework and applied it to rocks and they didn’t object, could we then assume they’re cool with it, or at least ambivalent towards it?
Claiming morality is objective, requires a moral judgement for one rock falling on another and crushing it.
Can “it doesn’t matter” exist on a moral spectrum? I guess if you had an “objective moral framework” that has a tertiary category for “morally neutral” then can it morally judge one rock crushing another as “neutral” / “not my jurisdiction”?
oh, and if we had that framework and applied it to rocks and they didn’t object, could we then assume they’re cool with it, or at least ambivalent towards it?
It could be possible.
But what objective moral framework exists? One that doesn’t depend on any observer.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
You didn’t evaluate the morality of the rocks.
deleted by creator
Then it’s not objective. It’s subjective to attributes of what’s involved.
deleted by creator
Which is exactly why it’s subjective.
deleted by creator
Objective, is independent of interpretation or even observation.
Using morality and objective together, means you’re using at least one of those words wrong.