Bring back hanging chads

America would turn into a flailing closed off crater

I don’t see that happening in the US and i have never seen it happen anywhere neofascists comparable to Trump are or were in power. Unlike you, i am not an American devil, so i am aware of politics outside of my own backyard, and none of it supports your idea. Trump’s brand of unhinged reactionary buffoonery isn’t exactly rare today. People like him get to be in charge in plenty of countires, many of them with less staying power than the US. They all do considerable damage, sometimes malice and ideological conviction play a bigger role in that, sometimes it’s mostly incompetence, but no matter how it happens, all it does is hurt already pauperized and marginalized people.

Boris Johnson did not turn the UK into a crater, Victor Orban did not turn Hungary into a crater, Erdogan did not turn Turkiye into a crater, Milei did not turn Argentina into a crater, the FPÖ did not turn Austria into a crater, Wilders has not turned the Netherlands into a crater, Meloni has so far also not turned Italy into a crater. I could go on, but i hope that in spite of being really fucking dense, you get the idea: There is no empiric evidence for your idea that Trump will meaningfully destroy America, it is pure wishful thinking.

You are coping. Accelerationism is just another way to support fascism while maintaining deniability of your support. Stop supporting fascism.

You’re right, fascism is an unstable death cult, but she’s also right: the fascist phase of capitalism stabilizes the economy and the whole system. That’s the dialectics of it. Fascism isn’t stable, because it doesn’t solve the crisis tendencies like communism does. But it does have a mid term stabilizing effect by delaying the crisis:

• A huge amount of value gets destroyed in fascists wars mitigating the crisis of overproduction. (That’s the main stabilizing factor)
• Patriarchy gets reinforced in reaction to the crisis of reproduction of labor power.
• Unions are destroyed, labor gets disciplined, burgoise democracy gets dismantled, enabling increased exploitation in reaction to the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. (That’s the main motivation for capitalists. They inevitably turn to fascism, when profits can’t be stabilized within burgoise democracy.)
• All the crisis raise the consciousness of people, which, in combination with organizing, leads to the looming threat of communism. Fascism kills all communist sympathizers first thing after taking power, effectively neutralizing this threat. That’s stabilizing too.

After fascism: the value is still destroyed, the economy booms from rebuilding, restrictive labor laws aren’t repealed, fascist officials remain in power, fascist values stay ingrained, communists stay dead.

Just look at Germany. It all played out after the war. The “economic miracle” during rebuilding. General strikes and political strikes are still illegal, Germans are still incredibly racist, Nazis lived long, happy lives in positions of power, new Nazi parties are being build up by intelligence agencies, communist orgs had to start from zero and they are often illegalized, communists are continuously prosecuted from the party bans after the war to the employment bans in the 70s to the imperialist crack down on free speach now.

Fascism needs to be fought and stamped out before it comes to power. If it’s already in power (like in the US) it needs to be fought all the more. China won’t save a people who aren’t willing to save themselves.

Literally every single Marxist theory of fascism emphasizes that it’s a reaction to capitalism in crisis. That the regimes themselves are obviously unstable does not change that they are invariably superseded by a capitalist successor state that utilizes the destruction wrought by fascism. The DDR was literally the only exception to that and that only happened due to direct occupation by the USSR.