• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        “Christian Feminism Today.”

        Are you fucking serious?

        No, no you’re not. Because the entire argument that article makes for her being a feminist is her weakly indicating she wasn’t entirely anti-abortion.

        Either you didn’t think I’d read that or you have an incredibly misogynistic idea of what a feminist is.

        So I think there’s no point in continuing.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 个月前

          Are you fucking serious?

          My guy, you want news stories from a twenty year old story via a search engine that doesn’t work. This is what you get. I’m sorry I couldn’t find Gloria Steinem’s “In defense is Harriet Miers” LiveJournal page, that URL was beyond me.

          Because the entire argument that article makes for her being a feminist is her weakly indicating she wasn’t entirely anti-abortion.

          You’re being nakedly dishonest. The article lauds her intelligence and independence and concludes she was ousted for being an unreliable conservative block vote.

          This is exactly why both parties keep returning to the Harvard Law Review well when selecting candidates. Any deviance from that singular legal institution is intolerable.

          It’s central to the case that both of these parties are putting up the same people.