• PugJesus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I had to look up the first guy

    On May 15, 2024, Harris joined a Zoom call court hearing from his phone while he was behind the wheel. Since June 2023, Michigan’s “hands-free” state law makes it “illegal to manually use a cell phone or other mobile electronic devices while operating a vehicle on Michigan roads.”

    Presiding Judge J. Cedric Simpson straightforwardly asked the defendant, “Mr. Harris are you driving?” To which Harris replied, “Actually, I am pulling into my doctor’s office,” adding, “so just give me one second, I’m parking right now.”

    Nearly a minute later, Harris informs the court that he is stationary.

    After looking through the paperwork, which includes Harris’ record, Simpson says, “Okay, so maybe I don’t understand something, this is for driving while license suspended?”

    “That is correct, your honor,” the defendant’s lawyer, Washtenaw County Assistant Public Defender Natalie Pate confirmed.

    “And he was just driving. And he didn’t have a license,” Simpson said. He appears to smile and hold back a laugh.

    Moments later, Simpson shook his head in disbelief, saying, “I don’t even know why he would do that. So, defendant’s bond is revoked in this matter.” He added that Harris must turn himself in to Michigan’s Washtenaw County Jail that evening.

    C’mon, man, it would’ve been better to be late by a few minutes than to show yourself driving with a suspended license to the goddamn judge.

    • AbsentBird@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Apparently his license had been restored in 2022, but due to a clerical error it was still listed as suspended. That’s part of the reason for the hearing.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Incase anyone reading hasn’t heard yet: the dude never had a license. He had a “suspended license” but getting that doesn’t actually mean you ever had a real license. He’s also renewed his ID every year. He’s just never gotten his license for no good reason.

    • atmur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Watching his lawyer and the judge trying so hard not to laugh is the funniest goddamn thing.

      Also these two:

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        My favorite part is right after the judge says “and he was just driving, and he didn’t have a license,” when you can see the realization that he just incriminated himself (further) wash over Harris’ face. 🫤 😮 😬 “…oh.”

        • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Actually, I’m thinking that face is the “what? It’s not a big deal” expression people have when they think they’re entitled and they just found out they’re not.

    • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Jesus fuck the laundry list of shit you could pin him with is endless so why the fuck would you need to make shit up? They literally did not find him liable for rape. He was found liable for sexual abuse. Why fuel the fire of misinformation when it’s the fire the person you are speaking out against thrives on.

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Whoa that’s insane.

    Nobody would ever vote for a criminal. Now imagine the president supported a straight up Genocide! Adolf Hitler style! Everyone would jump ship to a third party!

      • orcrist@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Who told you that? People who support those two parties? The corporations that fund those two parties? Maybe you’ve been played.

        • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          I’m reading this and can’t discern if you’re serious. On the one hand, the argument is insane and doesn’t address the actual calculus behind strategic voting. On the other hand, it reads exactly like what someone would say if they hadn’t thought about it other than deciding that voting is a moral evil a-priori and blurted out the first justification.

          • orcrist@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            I feel the same way about what you wrote.

            Where is the substance? Nothing you wrote actually addressed the issue, and your speculation was inaccurate as well. Meh.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s also about the justice system. If you are I commit multiple felonies, will get locked up. If we tried screwing around in court that much, if we were held in contempt multiple times, the same result would occur. But he’s rich and famous, at least for now, so he gets away with it, or at least he gets away with it for a lot longer.

      • 11111one11111@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The constitution is written to protect the people from the government. Whether or not it should still be taken at face value is another conversation. The reason a felon cannot vote but can run for office is to keep legislation honest and prevent, for example a power hungry sitting president or any official, from passing laws that would be used to incarcerate the opposing candidates. It’s to keep Trump from saying anyone with a last name rhyming with riden is a convicted felon and cannot run for office. It’s what Putin does year in and year out.