• odium@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That image is not car centric. There are more pedestrians in that image than cars.

      I count 11 pedestrians and 3 cars, but I might be off by 1 or 2 because of the lack of pixels

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, and the 3 cars have 3 lanes at each side of the building by themselves while the pedestrians are restricted to the sidewalk.

      • trent@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Radical political ideologists love the Fediverse and always have, be it anarchosocialists or confederates. Not sure why. I just want shitposts and tech stuff.

        • JusnJusn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yeah same here. I doubt that this platform will ever see mainstream adoption if the first thing that people are greeted by are criclejerky posts bashing capitalism and cars. It’s a shame, because I’ve been enjoying the platform a lot - just not the constant slew of ideas being pushed by it’s users.

      • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Great idea, and because they are pretty straightforward tunnels it would be cool if cars rode not on the pavement but in some kind of structure that keep the weels on track and lesser the friction. The cars could also connect one with each other, so the cars on the back are not affected by the wind resistance turbulence created by the first car. Eventually, only the first car would need a driver (or in a crazy futuristic scenario, being self-drive) and for easy connections with the city some stops can be added on strategic locations. Being this a service thatbis more suitable for metropolitan cities (digging tunnels are expensive) we should call this system Metro. What do you think? Pretty bold, but maybe in the future someone build something like this.

        • TheFerrango@lemmy.basedcount.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sounds like a really good idea.

          Perhaps one day we’ll achieve the level of technological development to build and operate such an advanced infrastructure

  • alokir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Spends all his life inside the simulation, trying to find dead futurebillgates’ keys and portals.

  • PeterPoopshit@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Is that a concrete shack with not just electricity but also an air conditioner? Mf must be super rich if this is the year 2041.