• LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why would less cars mean more shipping trucks? I don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.

        • nifty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Companies which rely on transporting products between different locations (like Amazon, UPS etc) will make use of emptier roads to transport more goods. More empty roads = more opportunities for operational efficiency for transportation companies

          Edit which isn’t a bad thing per se, companies should get to be more efficient, but not at the expense of tax payers who don’t want to subject themselves to public transport

          • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I think this is easily solved with increased fees on trucking, which is something we should be doing anyway since heavy vehicles are responsible for almost all of the wear and tear in the roads. Right now they don’t pay their fair share of the damage they cause.

            • nifty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Maybe but such companies are also very good at lobbying so it’s not “easily fixable”

              • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                True. Politically this would be tough but if we’re restricting private automobiles we’re already in magical Christmasland to some extent.