• Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      23 days ago

      If you can’t abstain then you don’t have a democracy. (Yes Australia i’m looking at you) You have a system of coerced consent where the political parties wouldn’t even know how to change, but that’s okay because there’s no incentive to change in such a system either.

      It’s literally the fastest way to get Party AB instead of Party A and Party B.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 days ago

        Great you started with the conclusion that not voting is fine and then tried to find a way to justify it. You failed.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          23 days ago

          I’m not going to write a 20 page paper for you. This is what it is. If people have to vote then the sitting parties have no reason to respond to voters.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 days ago

            What the hell are you talking about? Your solution to making democracy work seems to be telling people to stay home on election day. Fucking brilliant

      • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        Then people could abstain by writing in someone else. Not voting is a serious problem.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          Write ins aren’t actually a free for all in most states. You have to qualify with signatures for the state to bother counting them. So no, not really.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          23 days ago

          So in political philosophy ideals are only related to the common definition. This wiki page gives a good use of the philosophical definition in action.

          I probably should have used a different word on Lemmy though.