One source close to the negotiations said there was “frustration” on the UK side that Brussels had so far rejected giving Britain access to the databases.
“This is something that we would see as mutually beneficial but so far there has been no movement,” the source said
The entitlement is still strong on the far side of the Channel. First you leave and insult the EU to no end, you want out out out of everything related to it… and then you come crawling back whining about mutual beneficial cooperation.
A bit rich, I’d say
They’re not Brexiting hard enough.
There are people out there that actually believe this to be the case.
I normally don’t support bypassing paywalls for newspapers.
Quality journalism has a price. We should all support it. I lived in a country where all great newspapers collapsed, because no one wanted to subscribe (cultural reason). Only clickbait trash survived. I can assure you it’s really not a nice country.
However, I’ll make an exception for The Times, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch.
The same Rupert Murdoch who owns The Sun, Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, and many other media organizations. He also owned News of the World, a newspaper which illegally hacked crime victims and broke into the homes of UK politicians.
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-68615789
Rupert Murdoch once attempted to blackmail the British Prime Minister
https://www.channel4.com/news/major-denies-sun-editor-abused-him-after-black-wednesday
He is also a huge climate change denier:
https://time.com/5765304/rupert-murdoch-son-climate/
This man has done more damage to democracy than any other Australian.
Fuck Rupert Murdoch.
“I don’t support bypassing pay walls, except for sites owned by evil billionaires.”
Archive link provided for those who want to use it. I agree that good journalism should be supported.
“The more we can share, the better.” - says Starmer… you’re pulling my leg, right? …or I should say: “are you taking a piss, mate?”
The ones that were a condition of freedom of movement, you mean?
W
