• Rinox@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      Depends for what. Still better than random scales like 3, 12, 1760 and units that don’t mean anything like hundredweight, which isn’t even one hundred anything, unless it is because you live in another part of the world where the same word means a totally different thing.

      Fancy a pint?

        • Rinox@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I don’t agree. It might sometimes be cool, but with a numerical system in base 10, having a unit system in base 12 becomes really hard to manage. Let’s take meters:

          1m = 10dm = 100cm = 1000mm VS 1m = 12dm = 144cm = 1728mm

          How many mm is 15 dm in each system?

          To make a base 12 system work, you’d need to change the numerical system also, by adding two new digits, like we do for hexadecimal numbers, so you’d have …8-9-A-B-10, where A = 10 and B = 11 (in 10 base), so that 1m = 10dm = 100cm but in base 12.

          Anyway, good luck trying to pass that, I’ve seen people who can barely count on their fingers, let alone understand a new base 12 numerical system. And for what?

            • Rinox@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              That’s obviously not what I’m talking about.

              Not really that obvious. The imperial system is not used in base 12. It’s used in base 10 like everything else, therefore, if it were consistent with its units (which it isn’t) it would be more like 12 -> 144 -> 1728.

              Since changing how we count is honestly not realistic, the prospect of having to deal with a system that’s not based on 10 is kinda scary.

      • psud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        12 would have been a better base.

        The only thing going for 10 is that’s how many fingers you have if you can only count in ones