• draneceusrex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I agree with the majority of what you are saying, but stating either the USSR or China had a foundation as a republic I would say is a gross mischaracterization, as supreme power within these states were held by the “communist” party, and not the people. Authoritarian regiems may play at calling themselves republics or democracies, but this should never be given credence.

    • MetaCubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you for the correction! I agree it’s far more accurate to call them authoritatian/autocratic regimes both now and then which is what I was trying to indicate by saying they were single party republics, but I suppose one should say what they mean and mean what they say.

      • draneceusrex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        And thank you for accepting criticism on the internet! I think I might really like being on lemmy! I do see where your thinking was there, though.