• PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Prefferring the surety of another four years where they don’t have to think about politics over the chance for fundamental changes in how our political system functions when a large majority of the country aligns against a second Trump administration.

      God, accelerationism is so fucking dumb.

      • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        If we just let the fascists win then we’ll be able to usher in a socialist paradise! What’s unclear about that to you? Read a book! /s

        • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I hate and love how this is pretty much exactly accelerationism explained without the childlike naiveté.

        • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 months ago

          A literal pandemic killed millions of Americans and the status quo between the Democrats and the Ivermectin party barely even twitched.

          If you think there is a realistic electoral path out of our bipartisan death spiral, I would love to hear it. I’m just cynical enough not to be surprised that neither complicity in genocide abroad or the mass murders of schoolchildren at home will convince the Democrats to start treating Republicans like a threat.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              An end to the fillibuster.

              Fistfights in Congress.

              Omnibus bills failing as Democrats refuse to put Republican policies in place.

              Three-letter-agencies start prosecuting churches that give political endorsements.

              Y’know, anything other than bending over backwards to try and work with them.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                2 months ago

                Democrats refuse to put Republican policies in place

                Can you be more specific?

                An end to the fillibuster.

                I agree, and Senate Democrats seem to be coming around to it too.

                Fistfights in Congress

                Pointless, though amusing.

                Three-letter-agencies start prosecuting churches that give political endorsements.

                Agreed.

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Can you be more specific?

                  Romneycare, immigration, defense budgeting, etc etc etc.

                  Democrats are the only party still pushing bipartisanship.

                  • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I get that, I’m asking what you mean by “refuse”. You mean just vote against Republican policies every time, no compromise? Because they’re already almost doing that.

          • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            The way out of a death spiral is not directly into oblivion. It fucking sucks that genocide is in the category of really important things that need addressing but it is not in the category of things that can be addressed in this particular election.

            The electoral path is not at the ballot box every four years at the presidential level. It’s down the ballot and on the other the years. It’s building political capital for the cause you believe in by showing usefulness to the people seeking or holding power and talking to them about the issues you care about. Volunteer for your local house candidate and talk to people in their campaign about how important it is to you that they don’t support genocide, urge them to vote against arms shipments and denounce settlements. Tell your representative how you want them to vote and get other people to do the same.

            Working to get people elected gets them to listen to you, that’s why there’s so much money involved in elections.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              The way out of a death spiral is not directly into oblivion.

              So we need to change course, that means not doing the same thing we always do.

              It fucking sucks that genocide is in the category of really important things that need addressing but it is not in the category of things that can be addressed in this particular election.

              I strongly agree. Not only does it fucking suck, the lack of any reasonable choice betrays the entire electoral system as an anti-democratic waste that deserves nothing but our contempt.

              The electoral path is not at the ballot box every four years at the presidential level. It’s down the ballot and on the other the years.

              I can’t think of a response to this that isn’t condescending. It’s cute that you think we will be allowed to vote our way out of a system that is designed to keep the levers of power out of our hands.

              Tell your representative how you want them to vote and get other people to do the same.

              The better solution is not to put your fate in their hands in the first place. Don’t build political capital for someone else, build alternative structures of power that can serve the needs of your community.

              • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Okay, so you don’t believe in representational democracy. I’m not surprised that if you can’t be bothered to vote then you can’t be bothered to influence who you get to vote for.

                What’s a realistic way to build these alternative structures? How do these alternative structures work such that your local needs are met and the genocide in Palestine gets stopped?

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Okay, so you don’t believe in representational democracy.

                  Nope. Relying on political operatives to faithfully represent our interests is how we got into this mess in the first place.

                  I’m not surprised that if you can’t be bothered to vote then you can’t be bothered to influence who you get to vote for.

                  I already voted. I’m just not pretending that we get to have any influence over who we get to vote for.

                  What’s a realistic way to build these alternative structures?

                  Follow a historical example like the Black Panthers. If your community has an unmet need, serve it and use it as an opportunity to organize your neighbors.

                  How do these alternative structures work such that your local needs are met and the genocide in Palestine gets stopped?

                  Nothing threatens the structure of power more than the existence of organized groups of people who don’t depend on it.

                  • Dwemthy (he/him)@lemdro.id
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Please explain to me slowly because I have never read a political science book of any kind: how does threatening power structures through personal independence stop the Palestinian genocide?

        • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Every time the Dems look left they lose. They go to the center because they lose control (they need all 3 houses to do anything), so they go to the center to find voters. They’ve had control of all 3 houses for, drumroll please, 4 of the last 24 years. Want them to stop going to the center? Them give them victories.

            • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              2 months ago

              Note how Barqs did not specify which years those were, that’s because the answer would contradict their point. Half of those four years were Obama’s first, after he campaigned to the left on a message of hope and change but before his actual administration revealed him to be just another moderate.

        • Optional@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          As opposed to trying to make things better and avoid more suffering for everyone.

          Accelerationists have never lived through what they claim to want because if they did, and lived, they would no longer be accelerationists.

              • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I’ll take you at your word, which is trying, but even if true I prefaced my statement with original. This means you’re part of the plan, and you would have to be. Though you may not identify as accelerationist your existence is spurred on and enunicated by a foreign effort to defeat America by turning it on itself.

                Edit: My bad

                • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Again, I’m not an accelerationist. I’m a “Stop doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result”-ist.

                  And don’t tell me you’ll take me at my word and then immediately do the opposite. It makes me suspect that you are the thing you accuse me of being.

                  • Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    You call yourself what ever you like. I’ll refer to you as, useful idiot.

                    Edit: If I were a foreign actor I’m either very incompetent or am a genius for egging on you doubling down.

                  • LengAwaits@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    The only way you can look at the world right now and say “we’re doing the same thing over and over” is if you choose to ignore unfathomable swaths of nuance in some reductionist attempt to protect your own sense of self-righteousness.

          • knightly the Sneptaur@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Doing the same thing you’ve always done isn’t “trying to make things better”, it’s “trying to make things stay the same”.

            If you want to avoid suffering, you have to be against genocide.

            • Optional@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              My opinion is that you’re incorrect inside wrong wrapped in no.

              But I appreciate you’re hanging in there because I’m pretending you really care about stopping genocide. In the United States you could work for the BIA if you really cared about these things but I don’t know what the options are wherever you are.

        • Lauchs@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          I mean, that or all the angry young/middle age voters could, gasp show up to the primaries and move the party to the direction they’d like to see. Instead, the elderly voters, despite being a much smaller share of the population, outvote the heck out of them.

          If folks like you paid attention to politics when it matters, not just when it was trendy, things would be a lot different.

          Then again, reading what you’ve written, maybe it’s for the best y’all don’t.