• fading_person@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    7 days ago

    Celebrity news looked like that for me since I was a kid lol. I never understood how people are supposed to know celebrities and be attracted by such headlines.

    As a kid, I also liked to do crosswords, but I rarely could complete them, because they always asked things about celebrities. I hated it so much.

    • Ypsilenna Gloomvale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      Same. I remember trying to do crossword puzzles, and half of them were like, “Name of the actress who played X in the 90s series title.” Me: Hell if I know… name of a purple crystal used for jewelry and home decorations? oh yeah, I know this one!"

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      I’ve never cared about celebrity news for the sake of celebrity news, but I’ve found I very much care about the actual creation of the art that I like.

      That means sometimes I know about the relationship history of the songwriters whose albums I listen to, knowing that a post-divorce album might explore those themes. Same with when a standup comedian I like becomes a parent, knowing that the observational humor may shift as a result.

      For television and film, I know who’s signing deals with who, which actors and directors like working with each other, what some prior screenwriter was doing before the current project, which studios have reputations for interfering with the artistic vision, which directors and producers have reputations for mismanaging resources, which characters had to be written off of shows for off-set reasons, etc., because it all affects the end product.

      For sports, some of the off-field drama can affect the on-field product (suspensions or personnel movement for non-sports reasons, weird health conspiracy theories affecting one’s return from injured status).

      So I don’t really mess with celebrity gossip in itself, but I do follow industry news in television, film, music, the sports I like, and any other entertainment I enjoy.

      • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’ve found I very much care about the actual creation of the art that I like.

        I totally get that. I think it’s like that for a lot of people.

        Sad thing is, there’s a bunch of folks out there that aren’t all that deep. So “pretty people doing pretty people things” is about the level of involvement there. There’s probably an escapism/fantasy element there too, which may explain why we have people that are famous for being famous.

  • WraithGear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Is [celebrity noun 1] the new [trendsetter], or is he just getting [influenced with sexual undertones] by [celebrity noun 2]?

  • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    40 years ago and before, slang had to travel by… get this… word of mouth. Now one obnoxious tik tok influencer (and the word is valid because they do actually influence others) to say something for a 12 year old to make it the new thing in her school, thereby infecting an entire town/village/planet. it’s skibidi if you ask me. And I’m 55.

      • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        True. Radio is word of mouth, and the other forms of media are even slower. When one can sit down and doomscroll tik tok for an hour and be exposed to orders of magnitude more information, things are going to change more quickly.

      • MoonMelon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        Radio was huge. Some rapper could make slang local to his street corner famous and it would be in car commercials within two years.

    • fading_person@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      On the other hand, we don’t need to try to understand slangs anymore, because they will be obsolete tomorrow in the morning, when a new one appears.

      • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        No, some of them just become permanent.

        “Cool” first showed up in the late 1910’s and early 1920’s, and so fully absorbed into the culture that each subsequent generation just knows it without really considering it to be slang.

        “My bad” was novel slang in the 80’s, went mainstream in the 90’s, and is still with us today.

        I’d guess that among recent slang, “yeet,” “rizz,” and “drip” will have the most staying power, most likely to be picked up unironically by older generations and just propagated from there.

            • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              Well, that’s part of why I think those have staying power.

              Same with some slang that’s been around but has recently been elevated to new heights, like “cooked” re-entering the slang mainstream and some younger people thinking their generation invented it.

              Or newer syntactical/grammatical constructions that borrow from established phrases, like “it’s giving (noun or noun phrase)” to mean some kind of description. Or industry jargon that enters the mainstream. Once those hit a threshold popularity they tend to stick around as well.

        • fading_person@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          But the ones who get integrated into language for the long-term, we will eventually see them all around and it will be impossible to miss

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      When I was a 12 year old people were drawing that pointy S, which first started showing up in graffiti in the 70’s but became a staple in middle school notebooks by the 90’s. Somehow it had gone fully national without seeming to have any adult influence in its spread.

      Also around the same time, “my bad” entered the lexicon, and went from basketball-coded slang to basically mainstream acceptance by the 90’s, with this blog post from 2005 amusedly marking its use among Ivy League faculty members.

  • RoquetteQueen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    I never understood slang as a kid but I’m finally starting to figure it out. By the time my kids are teenagers, I’ll be a pro. They won’t be able to hide anything from me.

  • usernameusername@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m a big fan of the word ‘calc’. It’s short for calculator by the way, I’m just using slang. Oh by the way if anyone’s new to the stream, calc is short for calculator. I’m just using slang.

  • arcterus@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’m ngl I saw baby Gronk and immediately thought of a baby version of Kronk instead. I vaguely think this makes more sense anyway, so I’m just gonna pretend that’s what they meant.