• Tango@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s not that they’re afraid of society collapsing. They clearly don’t care about that, as most of what they do ignores that.

    What they’re worried about is the “Great Replacement”, where white people become a minority. If that wasn’t what they were really afraid of, then they would consider the problem of declining birth rates to be easily solvable with immigration.

    • Mommy Longarms@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      I mean, declining birth rates still cause problems. Even if you’re sane and don’t give a shit about shifting racial demographics.

      Shits gonna be really rough for my generation when we’re too old to take care of ourselves, while also outnumbering the young people.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        I hear this all the time, and it seems to ignore the glaring elephant in the room. When talking about whether you can keep an economic system going, what matters is not the ratio of workers to retirees, but the ratio of workers to dependents. Yes, we have more old people for each worker, but we also have fewer children. We can simply shift resources from child care to elder care. You manufacture more adult diapers and fewer infant diapers. More nurses go into gerentology than neonatal care. You shift government funding from elementary schools to pensions. More women can stay in the workforce, because fewer of us are having children. And those that do are having fewer of them.

        We know that economies can adapt to rapidly growing populations. We’ve survived baby booms just fine. After WW2, in the US, we suddenly had to care for far more children than our system was ever built to handle. Yet we managed to muddle through it. If we can adapt to a baby boom, we can adapt to a slowly aging population. Capitalism, for all its flaws, does have some benefits. And one of those is that it’s pretty efficient at reallocating resources based on changing demand.

        And honestly, there are some real upsides to declining population. We can ease our impact on the environment. The real cost of housing will decline. Scarcer workers will see their wages rise. This is the real reason the billionaires are so afraid of a declining population. They need millions of desperate people struggling just to scrape by. Do you think Amazon could run its hellish warehouses the way it does if the cost of housing was half what it currently is?

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 days ago

          That all assumes people will not be living longer in the future.

          The real cost of housing will decline.

          Children generally live with their parents. We’d have to all start living with our elderly parents for it to be the same in terms of housing costs.

          This is the real reason the billionaires are so afraid of a declining population. They need millions of desperate people struggling just to scrape by. Do you think Amazon could run its hellish warehouses the way it does if the cost of housing was half what it currently is?

          You shouldn’t assume billionaires are that intelligent. A huge amount of money has been invested into AI on the promise that it will take away people’s jobs. billionaires are emotionally driven idiots. They learned from Jack Welch that if you cut jobs, line goes up. Therefore if you cut half of all the jobs, line goes up big. They’re small minded people that don’t think in terms of how the economy functions, they only care about their businesses.

          If it were the case billionaires had some over arching plan for the economy, then Jeff Bezos would be thinking that if everyone were more prosperous, people would be buying more stuff from Amazon, wouldn’t he?

          They just want a bigger percentage of the pie, they don’t care if the entire pie is smaller and in absolute terms a smaller percent of a bigger pie is more than a larger percent of a smaller pie. Why would they? They already have more money than they could ever spend, so they’re obsessed with having more power than their competitors. Racking up a high score and gaining more power.

      • Tango@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        But your (our?) generation won’t outnumber young people if young people keep immigrating. Not that “keep foisting the burden of perpetual growth on the young” is ACTUALLY a good plan, but it’s exactly the kind of selfish arch-capitalist thinking that they’d be all in favor of if it was white young people.

    • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Also can’t oppress some wage slaves to to generate wealth for them if they are never born, it’s all about money at the end, white supremacy is a secondary concern

    • Napster153@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      If history is any indicator, the political elites will inter-marry with whatever target demographic that emerges into power.

      So you’d have people in the future claiming descendant from an Eterni-President-Prime-Dictator-Minister, whose face is this abomination of Caucasion-Afro American and some other gene just because.

        • Napster153@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 days ago

          Basically the person would have so many phenotypes from all the inter-marriages (and inbreeding, probably), you wouldn’t know where one began and one ended.

          • Tango@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            I still don’t understand. Are you saying that inter-racial marriage results in an abomination? If you’re attempting to use some sort of rhetorical device, it’s going way above my head.

  • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    7 days ago

    While I understand the reason why a demographic dropout would be a catastrophe, I fucking hate how they say it’s our fault, when they were the ones who fucked up everything in the first place

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’ll spot you “they” as the endless white nationalist nags and natalist pundits. For some reason “population collapse” never shows up as a concern for Palestinians or Cubans or Bangledeshis or Congolese. It’s only ever a rich white European problem.

      But this endless “I didn’t start the fire” rhetoric kinda ignores how the prior generation as a whole had about as much control over their material conditions as we do now. Just being mad at The Olds neglects how many of them delivered the education and health care and technology and agriculture that brought us to the modern moment [in a good way].

      Not to be all “you hate capitalism and yet cell phone” but you gotta see the prior generation as the same group of disaffected working class as we have in the modern day.

      Ffs, our parents were inundated with “Overpopulation” as the crisis du jour. They were lectured over having too many kids and having kids when they were too young and not being economically independent enough to care for anyone but themselves. We inherited that from them and internalized it. And now we meticulously practice contraception because we’ve been drilled to believe it’s the responsible thing to do.

      Only post-COVID have we really seen the Natalist Panic taking off. It’s a complete 180⁰ and largely the product of Millennial insecurities.

      • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Yeah, I meant “they” as the past gens (aka Baby Boomers), and no, we DO NOT have the same control over our material conditions as they had. Think that while house prices, rents for services and prices for a lot more things are growing up endlessly, at the same time salaries are not only totally unchanged, but they’re going down. Take into account that real estate is mostly dominated by older people, and most CEOs and other high-ranking figures are older people too.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 days ago

          we DO NOT have the same control over our material conditions as they had

          Explain that to every Boomer drafted to die in Vietnam. Or live long enough to get lead poisoning from paint and car exhaust. Or weapons testing radiation. Or AIDS.

          Hell, explain it to the folks whipped out after any of the market crashes and recessions of the 60s, 70s, and 80s. Nevermind the big ones in '01, '08, and '20.

          Think that while house prices, rents for services and prices for a lot more things are growing up endlessly, at the same time salaries are not only totally unchanged, but they’re going down.

          The Cold War Peace dividend accrued primarily to a minority of college educated white men. Mass incarceration, deindustrialization, and pollution ruined the lives of the plurality. For every white collar Reaganite with a boat and a white picket fence, there were three hippies, migrants, and racial/sex minorities eating that guy’s exhaust.

          Take into account that real estate is mostly dominated by older people, and most CEOs and other high-ranking figures are older people too.

          Survivorship bias. If you couldn’t secure a permanent residence or you lost it to unemployment, bankruptcy, and foreclosure, your life expectancy plummeted. Meanwhile, if Greatest Gen parents owned a home (and they were the ones who really got in on the ground floor) then your odds of owning one were significantly higher.

  • abbiistabbii@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s interesting because it’s obvious that the reason why people are having less children is because they can’t afford it and they don’t think it’s a good idea for the children.

    However, rather than actually remedying this situation, the people who want us to have as many children as humanly possible so they have more workers are doing everything in their power to make life worse.

  • Meursault@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yup. I’m just one private citizen. The replacement ratio of my country’s population is not my responsibility. 🤷‍♂️

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 days ago

      Republicans will simply declare that child birth is the patriotic duty of every American woman of healthy reproductive capacity. Men will be drafted to war. Women will be drafted into childbirth via forced artificial insemination. Legally speaking, if a man can be drafted to give up his life and sacrifice his body “for the greater good of the nation,” there’s little reason that a woman couldn’t be drafted for forced birth. If your government can force you to die for your country, your government can force you to give birth for your country.

      • FearMeAndDecay@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        You think it’s gonna be forced artificial insemination in that scenario? It’s absolutely going to go back to the times where women have to marry bc they’re not allowed to own anything (land, bank account, their own bodies) and marital rape won’t be considered real bc husband’s own their wives. Of course, this is if the fascists get their way. Given how the left has been rising up and voting in actual leftists/socialists in the primaries these last few months, the fascists are going to have actual opposition rather than just controlled opposition corpo dems

  • leavemealone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    We are in a shitty pay to win permadeath coop mmorpg where the game balance has been totally broken by indivualistic whales. Of course no new players want to subscribe to this shit.

  • nonfuinoncuro@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    in a way, this is my username:

    Epicurus rejected any possibility of an afterlife, while still contending that one need not fear death: “Death is nothing to us; for that which is dissolved, is without sensation, and that which lacks sensation is nothing to us.”[72] From this doctrine arose the Epicurean Epitaph: Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo (“I was not; I was; I am not; I do not care.”), which is inscribed on the gravestones of his followers and seen on many ancient gravestones of the Roman Empire.[73]

  • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    There’s been a rash of people like Elon Musk posting rants about “declining birth rates in the developing world” (and sometimes dog whistling while at it) - getting upset that contrary to the worries of Malthus and Ehrlich, it turns out humans are not the same as bacteria in a petri dish just exponentially reproducing until they exhaust all the carrying capacity of their environment. Instead, it seems that those of us that are in paradigms where we have relatively high per capita energy and materials consumption, respond to economic, cultural and environmental stimuli, and slow our roll once we feel we are at an “x” threshold of population density and environmental & economic stress.

    Given that we live on a finite planet with finite resources this small bit of self control might just be what saves humanity from a truly dystopian future.

    What the demographic shift of less younger workers versus more retiring seniors does mean is that our systems of depending on constant growth of consumption for our faith in our currency and financial institutions, and for providing for government guaranteed retirement funding, both end up under threat - but those issues could still be easily fixed simply by allowing more immigration from the multitude of places on this globe that still have relatively high birth rates, that have plenty of people with strong work ethics seeking greater opportunities.

    • stratoscaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      declining birth rates in the developing world

      Looks like it ain’t developing anymore lol

      I really like how you connected the birth rates and excessive consumerism as a self-fulfilling prophecy. As capitalism reaches its apex, motivations for increasing birth rate collapse. As birth rates collapse, excessive consumerism stagnates, because people can’t afford to retire.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      Given that we live on a finite planet with finite resources this small bit of self control might just be what saves humanity from a truly dystopian future.

      I don’t think it’s a planetary limit we’re hitting. Population expansion is highest in parts of the world with some of the worst living conditions.

      A lot boils down to access to contraception. Take that away and all those horny teenagers will fuck out more babies, because hormones override any kind of logical long term economic understanding.

    • GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      allowing more immigration from the multitude of places on this globe

      But then the immigrants will take all the jobs and also not work and take all the money from citizens.

      Do you even FOX bro?

    • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Immigration is really irrelevant to this discussion. Every country is rapidly aging, including the poorer countries that currently have above-replacement birth rates. We’re all going down the same path. Some nations are just further along the path than others. Unless there’s a large population of Martians eager to immigrate that I’m not aware of, immigration is not a long term solution to this.

      • TotalSonic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Total population across the planet is most certainly still climbing each and every year - significantly. And prior history (e.g. USA during the Ellis lsland era circa 1890-1924) shows allowing & enabling immigration most certainly can be a way of markedly improving economic outlooks for not just the immigrants but also the prior residents - for at least the next few decades, if not a good bit beyond that, perhaps even into the next century.

        And as for beyond that - again, my take is we should be celebrating that it looks like humanity, is not going blindly pop out babies beyond the carrying capacity of our planet.

        Of course we likely could be facing massive challenges due to climate change and idiotic policies being dictated by short sighted oligarchies. But at least it looks like the kind of overpopulation overshoot that was feared by lots of 20th century analysts might get avoided due to some arguably rational reactions by younger generations to the world they now find themselves in.

    • iocase@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      The area under the curve above 65 vs the area under the curve below 65 is the issue when combined with all of our institutions and social contracts being designed for endless growth

      50% of all new homeless people in the US are above 55 years old which should tell you how this is going to go. It’s not going to be like Japan for most western nations. Japan is the best case scenario.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’d blame contraception. And by blame I mean celebrate.

      But the idea that teenagers aren’t fucking because Capitalism really undersells the impact of hormones. Kids fucked under feudalism. They fucked under theocracy. They fucked as serfs and slaves. They fucked as cave people. The mode of production isn’t what’s at issue.

      Birth rates in North Korea are still below replacement level, same as South Korea. Some of the highest birthrates in the world are happening in active war zones. Some of the lowest in the safest and wealthiest.

    • KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hell, they had a private island filled with kidnapped little kids to rape.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re building another island filled with young, healthy, trafficked, white womb girls.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    Okay I’m gonna play devil’s advocate, it’s worrying because we are not adapting our system.

    I’ve always thought over population is a big issue but when I found out how our social security is intentionally a Ponzi scheme, it made me very worried.

    I don’t give two shits about the replacement theory but I’m worried that I am getting paid shit throughout my adult life since labour isn’t expensive yet but when if I need to retire, labour could become super expensive.

    Of course a sane society would just use all the excess wealth today to invest in automation but if we were sane, a lot of things would be better.

    • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yeah I fully expect not to receive a state pension in the UK, the Ponzi-like economics of it just don’t work for an aging population with a falling birth rate.

      The problem is that the government which brings in sustainability measures around this will be electorally annihilated for a generation at least, so the can keeps getting kicked down the road and the likelihood of events forcing a change rather than an orderly change in plenty of time increases.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Even if AI doesn’t reach the highs of science fiction, it will allow one person to do the work of many. Labor prices will probably keep going down for decades.

  • BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    oh no declining birth rates, how horrible for the ones who decided not to have kids, and hence don’t have anyone to worry about