Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoHome Depotslrpnk.netimagemessage-square124fedilinkarrow-up1902arrow-down113
arrow-up1889arrow-down1imageHome Depotslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square124fedilink
minus-squareproti@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·1 month agoit’s very much ai, generation?
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoPretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
minus-squarecelsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·edit-217 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down7·1 month agonope. it’s the plural.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoThe plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
minus-squareTropicalDingdong@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoNope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species. They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image. Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
minus-squareBluesF@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoStill wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down11·edit-21 month ago`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images. I was thinking of “genus”.
minus-squareEthalis@jlai.lulinkfedilinkarrow-up17·1 month agoI think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
minus-squaregrue@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·edit-21 month ago“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
minus-squaredeadbeef79000@lemmy.nzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoDerp, that’s what I was thinking of.
minus-squareKrauerking@lemy.lollinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThey apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out Generated?
Genera?
Genre.
it’s very much ai,
generation?
Have, you lost Ted?
Pretty sure that’s Italian for genre. Or a weird typo/autocorrect error/both 😁
deleted by creator
nope. it’s the plural.
The plural of genre is genres. The singular of genera is genus… Which might make sense here, but not as a plural.
Nope. Its genera in this context because they are discussing it as species.
They are pluralizing genus. Its a reference to it being a new “species” of image.
Your assumption of the word they are pluralizing was wrong.
Still wrong because they are refering to an individual “species” of image, so it would be genus not genera.
`Plural of genre. Still should have been singular “genre” though, unless there are multiple genera of these images.I was thinking of “genus”.
I think the word genre comes directly from the french word (“genre”, meaning “type”), which in the plural form is “genres”. I don’t think “genera” means anything, it’s probably a typo
“Genera” is a plural form of “genus” (i.e. also “type,” but in the fancy scientific sense used in taxonomy).
Derp, that’s what I was thinking of.
They apparently couldn’t be bothered to to type out
Yeah…no it isn’t.