• Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    10 hours ago

    How are so many people incapable of doing the literally most obvious and easy task of “do not fuck children” JFC.

      • procrastitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        They’re not lawyers, though… they’re reporters.

        They’re just reporting what the prosecutors accused the person of and if the prosecutor didn’t use the term “statutory rape” then the reporters probably shouldn’t either.

        They don’t want to get the reporting wrong if they aren’t experts on the subject and even more so the don’t want to expose themselves to lawsuits if they do get the reporting wrong.

        I really don’t think the reporters are trying to minimize the heinousness of the crime (at least not in this case). It looks more like they are just being conservative in what they state.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’m not very surprised that a teacher raped a student. I AM surprised (and glad) that she was dumb enough to talk about it TO ANOTHER TEACHER.

  • RejZoR@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Always the same wording when the rapist is a woman…

    • ZeffSyde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think that part of this narrative gets fucked because there is a fairly large segment of reporters that fantasized about getting with their cute youngish teacher back when they were in school.

      This is not to say that this is ok. It isn’t. This is SA, CSA, really. And even if the teacher were teaching/seducing 18 year olds on a college campus it would still be a gross misuse of power.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      A pedophile.

      Like literally, by definition.

      10 year age gap there, 26 yo woman vs 16 yo dude.

      Flip the sexes around, that’s a pedophile, no argument at all.

      Other than from people who really, really really feel its necesarry to ‘well actually you mean ephebophile’.

      Grooming is kinda the whole modus operandi here, they get off on the power dynamic, in every way you can interperet ‘get off’ and ‘power dynamic’.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        52 minutes ago

        Considering he is above the age of consent it is obviously NOT pedophilia.
        If she had been a neighbor it would be legal. The reason it isn’t is because she is a figure of authority. Which technically from a legal perspective makes it rape.
        In 14 US states it is actually legal!!
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent
        Are you really saying 14 states have legalized pedophilia?
        Do you even remember how it is to be 16?

        My sister has been happily married to her husband who is 15 years older than her for 30+ years, are you saying my brother in law is a pedophile because of the age difference?

        You are judgemental and pushing your norms on other people. And it’s disgusting you have so many upvotes!

        I had decided to resign from this debate, but some of the comments here, like yours are just so far beyond what lawmakers have decided in by far the most countries it’s insane. Are you also considering LGBT immoral?

        It’s wrong yes, but the term pedo should be reserved for when it’s justified, which it isn’t here.

    • Case@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Because pedophilia still exists.

      And a 16 year old boy will say yes to pretty much anything sexual, hence why this woman exploited a minor nah, not sugar coating. This woman used a position of authority to rape a child.

      • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Also. The teacher profession is all but dead in America. A lot of people that would be bad for students get weeded out through years of education and training. Most school districts are luck if they have more than 50% of their teachers educated/trained. The rest are individuals who could pass a background check. Poor areas, are under 30%. Just because someone can pass a background check doesn’t mean they should be around minors. But schools have no other option.

        • Case@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Heh, I applied for a substitute position a little while ago.

          Called back. I’m a MMJ patient, and only have a high school diploma, and no teaching skills or experience.

          They were fine with that. Obviously, don’t bring drugs on campus, but if its just residual in my system its fine with them.

          • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            My degree is in physical education K-12. When I graduate I didn’t go right into education. When I told one of my professors she cried full on tears. That’s how bad it is.

            I returned to education ~3 years. It’s scary. And I’m in a “wealthy” state. Our school’s are hanging on by a thread even with record low enrollments due to people not having children. (the only schools that were thriving were the ones with massive migrant populations.)

            • Case@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              I spent a year working at an elementary school, in an IT capacity.

              I was at a fairly wealthy district, but Texas “Robin Hood Laws” distributed a lot of their taxable wealth to poorer districts and such.

              That being said, all the kids that went there for the most part had rich parents.

              So the stay at home moms always organized fund raisers. Bake sales, that kinda crap.

              And the rich kids, or any parents who stopped in, bought treats.

              I mean, it worked… but not without a lot of disposable income at home.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Because it’s the fact that she’s the teacher. A position of authority. It’s why a cop cannot have sex with someone who they pulled over, or why a psychiatrist cannot date their client.

    • rkw_social@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Abusing a position of trust is a bigger deal than it seems. Being in a position of power means there was an unspoken element of coercion in the relationship.

            • missingno@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Your European school’s curriculum went over every single US state’s age of consent?

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Considering I linked the info from wikipedia, this must be the stupidest comment in this thread.
                Age of a consent is a common thing in all countries, but the age is different.

            • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              In this case, age of consent is mostly irrelevant. A 26 year old fucking a 16 year old is bad, legality is unimportant. The fact that she’s been charged, means that it’s probably not legal. How about we just say “wow, that removed raped a child”, instead of being pedantic.

                • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Legality doesn’t matter to me. This is morally wrong. The age difference is wrong. The abuse of trust and authority is wrong. And linking a wikipedia page to where this would and wouldn’t be legally okay, is a little weird. A 30 year old woman fucking her 50 year old boss is wrong in a similar way, but not necessarily illegal.

          • morphballganon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Tons of reasons to research this. For example: can I get person x arrested for what they did to me/my sibling

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            12 hours ago

            This ain’t his first Internet argument, maybe? That’s why I know it, anyway.

            Knock it off with your bad-faith insinuations.

            • FerretyFever0@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              12 hours ago

              It’s weird to immediately be jumping to the defense of the teacher. This should not be hard to understand. A 26 year old woman raped a 16 year old. It’s very simple. That’s wrong, and in my humble opinion, worthy of punishment.

    • magnetosphere@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Next, are you going to give us a lengthy explanation of the difference between “pedophile” and “ephebophile”?

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Um… “Abused a position of trust” ≠ rape? You might wanna check the definition, friend. 😅😶

        • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          All due respect, but you seem to be confusing your awareness of the definition with the actual thing. Please do confirm for yourself what the details of this term are. 🙇🏼‍♂️✊🏼