• Mongostein@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If they spent that energy campaigning for election reform instead of harassing Lemmy users I’d find it more convincing.

  • Soup@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    They’re not here in good faith and I don’t believe they ever were.

  • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Maybe the most egregious example of this was something I saw yesterday, which was somebody saying “Tim Walz needs to go vegan”. When pressed about why him and not, say, Donald Trump, they said that people on the left and center were more likely to actually be swayed. It wasn’t worth engaging any further, but I thought it was pretty hilarious that they bothered to try to push the 60-year-old VP candidate to go vegan, but not the 40-year-old VP candidate. Like, you know that you’re not pushing the needle for anybody with that post, right?

    It’s about as useless as making a post saying that JD Vance should hang dry his clothes instead of wasting energy running a clothes dryer.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Suggesting it’s easier to convince a Midwestern football coach/car dad to go vegan than an NYC germaphobe is a level of optimism I have never seen

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Look pal, the general said “sow division” amongst whatever socio-political lines we can see, ok? Why Do You Hate Black Vegan Catholics???

      (/s obl.)

  • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    A trolley barrels towards a bunch of construction workers stuck on the tracks.

    • If you pull the first lever it will divert and only kill one person.
    • If you don’t pull the first lever it will kill 100 people, including that one person from before - he’s standing before the track change.
    • But, and now this is key, there is a second lever to the right of the first that says “Display lever only, does nothing.” It does nothing.


    What do you do?

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      You blame someone else. It’s definitely not your fault, it definitely cannot be that.

    • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I said throw shit onto the track to try and stop the trolley once.

      The philosophy majors did not like me pointing out it was ridiculous to imagine the problem existing in a void with an absolute limit on possible courses of action.

      They liked it even less when I reminded them that the problem was invented to make fun of them by a philosopher who was arguing that both courses of action were ridiculous conclusions to reach given the broader context of a trolley crash not existing in a vacuum.

      Thought experiments in the void is how we got the declaration that feathers and lead weights were affected by different rates of gravity.

      • acid_falcon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Cool, so if you dont vote for Harris, you’re wasting your vote.

        I also think philosophy is mostly dumb. But there is a vacuum here, shitty democracy or fascism. You can throw shit on the tracks, that just means one less vote against fascism

        • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          I was talking about the philosophy problem itself not the FPTP vote. As you could probably guess from the context of me dunking on the philosophy majors so much.

  • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Sorry, guys. I’m voting for the only candidate that can end global warming.

  • almar_quigley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Where are all the Russian plants, oops I mean true progressives, at to tell us we’re just not leftist or progressive enough and Jill is totally definitely only ever trying to improve things for the country, ignoring her meeting with Putin and aides, and also Kamala is literally no different than Trump! Universalmonk, verdantbanana….i need you to straighten OP out! /s

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    13 hours ago

    look i have had the choice for with or without lube for half a century now. Thing is saying I don’t want to get sodomized at all just results in the default of without lube. I hate it with lube but I really, really hate it without.

    • elliot_crane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      You can’t call any of them by name, unlike Beetlejuice. You have to post something positive, even mildly so, about the Harris/Walz campaign. Then all the little rats come scurrying over to tell you how you’re a genocide stan and any real American should be voting for Cornoliverill Stein de la Fruit, and it’s definitely not because daddy Putin said so.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      I broke the script the other day when they said they were ok with a trump second term. That they weren’t afraid of trump. I highlighted the conservative judicial appointments impact the working class and minority groups and they simply couldn’t address it.

  • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Discouraging 3rd party voting hurts democrats more than anyone. Studies show that 3rd party presidential candidates largely bring out people that would not have voted otherwise and largely benefit the democratic party down-ballot.

    Don’t tell your apolitical friend about how they shouldn’t vote for Cornel. Don’t tell your friend about how voting for a 3rd party is pointless. Don’t tell your friend to vote for your person. Tell them to vote.

    Edit: here’s my receipt.

    Independent voters supported Democratic candidates over Republican candidates, 49% to 47%, according to the exit poll by Edison Research for CNN, ABC, NBC, and CBS. According to the AP VoteCast survey for The Wall Street Journal and Fox News, independents supported Democrats over Republicans, 42% to 38% … While independents nationally voted for Democratic candidates by just 2 points, they supported Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly over Republican challenger Blake Masters by 16 points, Georgia Sen. Raphael Warnock over Republican Herschel Walker by 11 points (in the Nov. 8 election), and, for senator from Pennsylvania, John Fetterman over Republican Mehmet Oz by a whopping 20 points. ( My note on Fetterman, this was before the stroke)

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      14 hours ago

      And from a casual perspective, telling people their vote is pointless is (a) a way to show them you’re an asshole, (b) mostly pointless, and © quite possibly true regardless of how they vote.

    • Omega@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I like it. Tell them to vote, then encourage them to vote for Harris (especially if you’re in a swing state).

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        You can try that, but they should be separate conversations. Have one conversation about how voting generally is good. Then have another conversation about candidates. Trying to roll it all in one will still discourage those types of voters for the partisan appearance.

  • Fish [Indiana]@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Yeah, I’m gonna continue with my lesser evil voting like I do every election. The Democrats pinky promise that they will put forth good policy in the next election cycle.

  • sumguyonline@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Nothing gets better permanently under Democrats. Nothing gets better under Republicans. You sir or ma’am, are a moron, and a traitor to the Republic. You’ve chosen the side of traitors. You’re either a shill, or a willing idiot. Your kind have a new world to face. One without your comfortable lies instead of inconvenient truths. Now your kind along with everyone else your kind has doomed, has to face harsh realities. Enjoy the apocalypse. Should be a show.

    • celsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      In case you’re not aware, there are 350 million Americans that depend on government policy making in order for it to all function properly. Is Trump your guy for the job?

      • distantsounds@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        15 hours ago

        In case you aren’t aware, Biden, not trump is currently responsible for supplying the weapons being used for the genocide going on right now. Are you cool with whitewashing genocide? Or is gaslighting your thing?

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Of the two choices, which do you believe will result in the most harm?

          • distantsounds@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            I believe if you keep aiding genocide, it will result in the most harm. If you stop aiding genocide it would lead to less genocide.

              • distantsounds@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                Stopping this can be done right now. It would be much easier to a win election if you didn’t have to apologize for genocide or committing ongoing support for it. The candidates need to earn votes, which is completely doable before Nov 5th. I don’t see enough of a distinction on this. It incredibly stupid waste of money to support this glaringly evil state.

                Edit: Vermin Supreme