• yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ironically, removed was originally a kinder word cooked up to describe people with lower intelligence, along with moron, idiot, cretin, and imbecile. Over time these became pejoratives. Just kind of interesting to see how language develops and terms intended to avoid offense over time turn into ones that offend people.

  • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I mean, i never really stopped calling people like Rogan and Trump removed… But calling it a great cultural victory, is just… removed.

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not american and don’t care about politics but I was watching a show the other day and when Rogan appeared as a guest I had to shut off after 5 minutes. This person is so annoying I couldn’t stand. Don’t know how you guys do it. I didn’t even liked him in newsradio and I loved the show.

  • DrownedRats@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Honestly, if the culture war has been going on this long and the “greatest victory” they can show for it is feeling comfortable using the r slur again, thats just deeply sad for them lol.

    • witnessbolt@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I think wayyyyy more people than you realize say it. Even people you think are raging leftists. Most of us got quiet because we in general agree with left leaning things. Feel free to skim my profile…

      But man… fucking EVERYONE says removed. I’m very left leaning. Once I got away from a few select people… it was genuinely kind of a culture shock for me how many people say it lol.

      I’m not advocating for people to just sling it like crazy… and I know in a way that’s kind of what’s gonna happen to SOME EXTENT… but as someone who tried to push other folks toward not saying this in the past…

      I 100% think it’s a lost cause. I don’t think it’s going away. I don’t personally think it’s ableist and never did.

      To make a comparison, from my perspective, it’s kind of like turning the word “insane” into a slur… we did some reaaaal bad things to people under the veil they were “insane.” We put people in jail and mental hospital for most of their lives. We fried their brains with medication and lobotomized them both chemically and physically. It’s not as common, but it is 100% an insult to tell someone they are insane or acting insane (I mean if they’re bashing their skull into a tree or somethin that IS insane but that would also be an extreme example to call someone removed over)

      But we don’t get upset about calling people insane today… everything has context and I think the context of removed has moved on from why people are offended.

      A more apt comparison is being equally mad you called someone slow… I mean… removed is literally a word for slow in French… it kinda really only become ableist when someone wants it to be interpreted that way. At what point is simply calling someone stupid not also then ableist? Are we gonna crucify people if they use any other insult beyond “ignorant” that doesn’t indicate the insultee’s willingness in their stupidity? Or is “you lack/display a lack of intelligence” (the definition of stupidity) somehow more classy than slow and removed in your eyes?

      My 2c is that unless you expect to erase the word (you’re not going to) you’re better off helping to change the meaning in common view (most of us just think it means ya RLY RLY fkin dumb but use a word beyond stupid or idiot) and steal it back from them. Grinding to death and dividing OURSELVES internally over shit this nonsensical is killing us.

      It’s an easy code switch that uses their language against them and makes you more credible in their eyes 🤷🏻 as an ally I’m just saying not every battle can be won the way you originally wanted it to be

      TLDR: bunch of different justifications for why I call MAGATs removed when they make stupid points in arguments

      • Shayeta@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I also find it funny that calling someone a removed is considered less acceptable than calling someone an idiot. Especially when examined under an ableist lens.

      • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t know if it’s the circles I’m around or what, but this is not my experience at all. As someone with a nonverbal autistic loved one who was bullied with this slur, I disagree with the idea that it doesn’t cause harm to continue to use it. If someone uses it I ask that they don’t use it around me and that’s been respected. Language evolves over time, and we need to evolve away from using what was relatively recently a medical diagnosis as an insult.

        • Halosheep@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I think it’s absolutely fair to ask someone not to use a word that you don’t care for around you. The problem arises when you attempt to make that everyone’s problem, not just yours.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        100% think it’s a lost cause. I don’t think it’s going away. I don’t personally think it’s ableist and never did.

        I don’t think it’s ever going fully away. But it is still important to call it out when we see it.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just in case anyone had begun to consider that Joe Rogan is anything but an absolute infected boil on the ass of civilization.

  • Tempus Fugit@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Lol, I’ll never understand these people. The word “removed” was never gone. At no point was it illegal or impossible to say it, similar to any other word. The worst consequence for saying something that’s bound to piss people off is just that, pissed off people. You never faced jail time and I can’t think of anyone “canceled” for it.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      The word “re----” was

      The gusp I gasped was so intense that I broke the pearls I was clutching.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The worst consequence for saying something that’s bound to piss people off is just that, pissed off people.

      There was a real moment during which celebrity reactionaries feared The R-Word would result in the kind of deplatforming and loss of advertising patronage historically reserved for The N-Word or any of the Seven Words You Can’t Say On TV (which, curiously, did not include the N-Word at the time).

      So the worst consequences wouldn’t have simply been “pissed off people”. Perhaps they’d have endured lawsuits, de-platforming, or even vigilante violence (not uncommon in religiously-tinged censorship - like with the Piss Christ display or the Draw Mohammad contest).

      You never faced jail time and I can’t think of anyone “canceled” for it.

      Not when the current regime is friendly to your operation, no.

      But if you look at what’s happening to pro-Palestinian activists and Women’s Liberation organizations, it’s obvious that state and civil institutions have lots of tools for fucking people over based entirely on their stated political views. The real defense that Rogan, et al enjoy is having their friends in charge.

  • ceenote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    211
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    It must be nice to have so much money and freedom from consequences that that’s the kind of thing that bothers you.

    • gamer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      72
      ·
      2 days ago

      Or such little money and brain cells that that’s the thing that inspires you to go out and vote against your own interests

    • Norin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m absolutely convinced that there’s a certain threshold of money/power/privilege that just destroys a person’s humanity.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Nah, you’ve got it backwards. You don’t pursue that level of money/power/privilege unless you lack humanity. These guys were always shit, but power made them more effective at being shit.

  • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    You see, the problem with that word is that people who want to keep it around really make me wanna use it.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    It never left. Using it still makes you look like an asshole.

    All these “free speech absolutists” still don’t realize that free speech does not mean immunity from consequences of that speech from your fellow citizens. It’s almost like they just haven’t paid attention for their entire lives.

    • SoupBrick@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I mean, their position falls apart when you ask them what they think about the college students being oppressed for protesting.

      They do not care about free speech. They care about experiencing social consequences when using hate speech.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes. And it’s just hypocrisy all the way down: otherwise, as you say, we wouldn’t hear anything negative about the left exercising right to protest.

        On top of r/conservative is a post about “the algorithm” flooding someone’s feed with news about US protests. Of course, the response wasn’t “hey great! Look at all those people exercising their right to free speech!”. Instead, it’s just removed and claims of fake news (and no understanding that there really may be significant protests right now – just automatically, they must be false). There is no logic for people who can no longer discern facts from opinions.

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      I do not care about the word or what language people use broadly, as long as they’re using their “offensive words” to punch up.

      If you’re punching up, if you’re attacking power, I do NOT care and genuinely wish people would pull the gloves off more. But Joe Rogan IS power, he is so high up that anywhere he punches is down. People with great power who use language recklessly need to be knocked down for abusing the power behind their language.

      • newfie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        So calling Trump a regard is acceptable then?

        That’s not a gotcha - tbh the “left”, to the extent there is such a thing in the US, would be more likable if it used the language of the actually existing working class to communicate its criticisms of capital. Tone policing is not an effective way to organize the proletariat or to spread class consciousness

    • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      You are a asshole for calling someone removed. It is so incredibly offensive that you have to be a special kind of jerk to say it.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        What about the word is offensive?

        Is it just as offensive as calling someone stupid, moronic, dumb, or an idiot?

        Is it that insulting someone’s intelligence is inherently offensive? Or is it just that it’s one of the most recent to be medically obsolete?

        • juliebean@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          i can only speak for my experience. growing up autistic, i was targeted due to my different ways of thinking and acting for bullying, using the r-word to belittle and demean me, far too many times, for hearing it used to mean ‘bad’ to feel like anything but an attack on me or those like me. when someone uses the r-word casually, it hurts, and a fully automatic system, borne of hard experience, files that person away as a probable threat. i don’t understand why people want to use the word so badly, knowing it hurts people, and knowing it’s not necessary or even all that useful of a word.

        • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is much worse as it implies that they are disabled due to there extremely low intelligence. The word by itself isn’t bad but you shouldn’t call someone removed.

          I believe it comes from the metal removedation diagnosis from 70 years ago or so.

          • ameancow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Not trying to be an ass here, just genuinely curious, the words “idiot” or “moron” or “imbecile” which were also in the same diagnostic tools as “removed” so what makes them different?

            I have seen earnest attempts at starting movements to abolish these words as well, (and usually at that point a lot of people start tuning the conversation out,) so I’m wondering where people’s feelings are on the broader topic or if it’s the use of the singular word and how it’s used that bothers people the most.

            • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              2 days ago

              I think, though I could be wrong, that when many of us were growing up, the words “idiot” and “moron” had already shifted meaning. So we learned them without the connotation of mental capacity and disabled people. But “removed” still meant both things.

              • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                But calling someone an idiot is explicitly insulting their intelligence just the same.