• Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It’d evaporate much quicker TBF. Although that also means that the BP would be much lower and tea and coffee wouldn’t be a thing and boiling wouldn’t be a reliable method of cooking. although on the flip side, you could increase the strength of alcoholic beverages by boiling the water off instead of distilling the alcohol.

    • ornery_chemist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Yes and no. No surface tension implies vanishing intermolecular forces, so the liquid would not be cohesive and would expand in all directions to the volume of the room… which is pretty much the definition of a gas. Not quite though: supercritical fluids also do this as long as temperature and pressure remain high enough, and are indeed useful in niche applications industrially.

    • SonOfAntenora@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Liquid with low to none surface tension? Relatively possivle, tensioactives and additives within soaps and washing up liquids can do that.

      And lakes affected by this are biologically damaged or dead, as surface tension is essntial to life.

    • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      You can not “make” a given liquid like that but there are some liquids with low surface tension. From the back of my head I remember the Avogadro experiment, but to lazy to look it up. What I recall is that he “counted” the amount of particles in a drop of oil because it forms a mini layer of lying on top of water. You might notice when you drop a bit of oil in water, that it always creates a giant puddle.

      Back to the original post: that thin layer of water would just evaporated instantly

      • tetris11@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        wouldn’t it also be impossible to drink? The water would just seep out of any cup and find the path of least resistance to the floor

        At least with oil you can just raw dog the nozzle and squeeze it directly in, guzzling down those calories by the gallon at least until the attendant starts to run over, but by then you pull out your lighter threateningly and shake your head until he backs off again

      • Obi@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        So it would actually be more practical, don’t need to mop it up if it evaporates.

        • Zwrt@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          This is how science fiction is made! Special Meta materials are very under-explored, It seems reasonable that in a future high tech society they would be increasingly common.

          Mostly we get “faster engines” and “advanced computermachines that sometimes perform unexplained magic”

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    We would not have life! Water is a polar molecule that is very different from most other liquids. Its the specific surface tension properties that help to create life. The reason why we search for planets with water. We’ve never worked out a way for any life to exists without the amazing H2O.

    • icelimit@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Now imagine what wonders we could have if there were a few other quicky molecules.

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        As an odd thought experiment or are we hoping that the laws of physics might be different there? All water, except brand new in reaction space is almost certainly going to contain dissolved ions

        • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Well I think the idea is more that for some reason water needs to be treated with something that removes surface tension if you want to safely pipe it to people’s houses. At least that shouldn’t destroy all life.

  • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Would that mean that if you jumped into the Atlantic you’d just fall to the bottom? Or would that be due to buoyancy or something

  • betahack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    12 hours ago

    look…I’m just glad roaches don’t have sharp teeth and spiders can’t fly.

    let’s stop while we’re ahead

    • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 hours ago

      When some spiders are born, sometimes hundreds at a time, they cast little parachute webs and ride the wind to wherever they might go.

      Palmetto bugs are like mean flying roaches that bite.

      You’ll never escape the horrors of the beauty in nature.

  • BedInspector@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Well if water didn’t have its unique properties of cohesion and adhesion we likely wouldn’t be here anyways.

    • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It relies on differences in surface tension. If a liquid has a lower surface tension (energy) towards one surface than another, you get the typical capillary effect. In the case of water, the water-air energy is lower than the water-<whatever your capillary is made of> energy, so you get a capillary effect.

      If water had exactly zero surface tension against every interface,

      • it would not exhibit any capillary action
      • life on earth would cease to exist quite quickly
      • your socks would remain dry