• Kalysta@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 days ago

    Bernie.

    Bernie was what got us to vote for Biden. Biden formed a comittee with Bernie and actually adopted a bunch of his ideas. That’s what got the left to vote for Biden.

    That and all of us were reeling from the economy after coronavirus.

    Meanwhile Harris told the left to fuck off with your Palestinians are human nonsense and tried to get the Liz Cheney constituency (that doesn’t exist).

  • sudo@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ten Million commies in the US - lol - if only.
    Flaunting your Dick Cheney endorsement isn’t being insufficiently left. Its political suicide.

  • hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 days ago

    Covid is the reason democrats won in 2020, but they assumed they won because they’re geniuses. Instead of trying to appeal to voters, they just tried to tell people to vote against trump. Turns out that isn’t enough to motivate people when there isn’t a pandemic raging on that is making people’s lives miserable. Democrats really need to get their act together because 2028 won’t be against trump, so the “anyone but trump” strategy will be even more useless and all that time spent kissing the asses of ghouls like dick cheney just tells people that republicans are okay to vote for.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      Biden won by a really thin margin in swing states, the book Lucky went into detail about how close of a call it was, but he interpreted it as some huge popular win because of the high vote totals.

    • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The pandemic of 2024 is corporate profiteering. A great example is Kroger admitting they raised prices higher than inflation for profit.

      People generally blame the current administration for that. They are the one that kept trotting out stock market numbers and unemployment numbers, and acting like things are fine.

      If they wouldnt even acknowledge the problem, how are they going to attract voters?

      Thats not even bringing up gaza, but I dont think either candidate will change that situation in any way. The current administration is signaling they think this is a great opportunity to shake up the middle east for the benefit of western countries, cause colonialism can’t ever die I guess.

      All trump ever said was end it, that it should be over already. Thats just as vague as kamala saying she will do everything in her power to end the war. They both could be implying to carpet bomb gaza, but we won’t know until we know right?

      Neither candidate talked about why we should allow israel to lobby in our politics either.

    • Disgracefulone@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well be lucky if there are elections any more after this term. He already said if he’s elected there won’t be another election. You think he’s joking? This mf isn’t giving up power willingly. And with his sycophantic base, you’d be surprised what he can accomplish.

      I’m in literal fear for our country.

  • psion1369@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    What got people to vote for Biden but not Harris? A dire need. Not voting for Biden meant that Trump stayed in office. Even though the stakes were the same, too many people sat on the couch thinking it was going to happen again and they didn’t have to go.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    Biden would not have won if we weren’t also in the middle of the greatest global pandemic in a century that the incumbent Trump administration was handling terribly.

  • Olhonestjim@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Look, the Democrats have to own this loss, for once, like they should have last time. It is clearly insufficient to try and frighten democratic supporters with a probability of fascism which we’ve never experienced before. It is clearly insufficient to abandon the working class as they have for so long. We should never fund or promote far right candidates in primaries. The media should not provide free coverage for outrage candidates to drive viewershop. It is clearly a mistake to try and court conservative voters, because hardly any have ever crossed over. It was certainly a mistake for Biden to run again, and then to drop out so late, far too late to have a primary.

    Maybe the fact she is a minority woman turned people off. I don’t know. It’s a stupid reason not to run women, but that possibility exists.

    But it damn sure isn’t the only reason we lost.

  • adhdplantdev@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    Mean is no one going to call out the strategy for like the last month to possibly 3 months was her pandering as hard as she could to Republicans moderate and isolating the leftist Democratic base?

  • Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    What about Joe Biden made him sufficiently left while Kamala Harris wasn’t?

    -Joe Biden wasn’t campaigning to finish building Trump’s wall. Or saying that actually it was a good idea to build the wall and the only problems were just that Trump said Mexico was going to pay for it and that he didn’t finish the job.

    -Joe Biden wasn’t campaigning on being pro-fracking. And bragging about how he was the tie breaking vote for the IRA, which leased new land for fracking. (I understand there was more to this act, but Harris points to it as a way to show she supports fracking)

    -At the time the genocide in Gaza hadn’t ramped up and gotten as much publicity as has now, so we didn’t get to hear Joe Biden’s stance on it.

    -Joe Biden wasn’t calling to ensure America has the “strongest most lethal fighting force in the world”.

    -Joe Biden didn’t align himself with the Cheneys.

    You see that 10 million more Democrats voted for Biden, but stayed home for Harris and you believe the problem is with the people and not the candidate? Now granted, racism and sexism played a role in this for sure. But to attribute that much of a difference just to that? Most of the people that are deeply racist and sexist are already voting for Trump because he supports those ideas. And from what I’ve seen, the Republican voters stayed pretty consistent from last election. It was mainly a dip in Democratic voters. If the problem is with the voters and not just that Harris was an incredibly weak candidate, then why do you believe that many more people voted last election?

  • Keith@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Because Biden was to the left of Harris, and Gaza wasn’t a big issue? Like yeah, the people who didn’t vote did so because of Harris’ move to the right

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I’ve heard the following arguments, I’m ordering them in the way I think they effect an election.

    1. Elon musk buyout and the AI lockdown of social media, and banning of tiktok have all had the effect to fracture democratic/leftist messaging (fault: dems, biden, musk, reddit, people who stayed on x. Affected groups: young people, people who are hard to reach with ads)

    2. The primary election is basically undivertable campaign time for democrats. The lack of primary campaigns and debates means harris had less time to build support and a base (fault biden, affected groups: everyone).

    3. Lack of economic excitement around policies and a shutdown of effective messaging on price gouging in favor of saying a former president will surely destroy the country this time. (fault Harris, donors effect, likely low turnout on younger people)

    4. Lack of demographic excitement around key policies. Latinos: Immigration. Muslims: Israel. (fault biden/harris, effect low turnout in key groups)

    5. Wasteful campaign spending on republicans: Courting Liz Cheney and buying ads to woo republicans at best wasted money and at worst is a giveaway to telecoms who immediately donated it to republicans(fault Harris, effect waste)

    6. Covid provided a boost in 2020 that no longer exists

    7. Mail in voting helped some people vote in 2020. I would say this a tossup however because I do think republicans are able to abuse flaws in mail in systems.

    8. Harris is a woman. I don’t buy this one because nonvoters seem disengaged rather than hostile.

  • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago
    • Obviously, the main reason for record turnout in 2020 was COVID.

    • Biden actually has decent political instincts and has actually won elections before. Kamala didn’t even have to pass a primary and bombed out of the one she did participate in in 2020. She was “untested” to put it mildly.

    • The economic situation was different.

    • Regardless of to what degree he was responsible, under Biden the US got entangled in foreign conflicts in Palestine and Ukraine.

    • It’s not that there are 10 million commies that liked Biden but not Harris, it’s that us commies believe that you can win over the working class by appealing to material interests.

    • Biden didn’t campaign with fucking Dick Cheney

    • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      Biden actually has decent political instincts and has actually won elections before. Kamala didn’t even have to pass a primary and bombed out of the one she did participate in in 2020. She was “untested” to put it mildly

      I believe democrats called bernie Sanders “unelectable” so I feel it’s fair to use that term in this circumstance.

    • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 days ago
      • Trump was a bigot, which is what a majority of Americans wanted.

      Weird how so many of you demonize the largest most powerful organization of antifascists in America instead of those who voted to give Trump power. It’s almost like you are trying to sow division in the anti-trump electorate 🤔

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        largest most powerful organization of antifascists in America

        Please do not insinuate that the Democratic Party is Anti-Fascist. They have have adopted Trump’s 2016 border policy, are unconditionally funding a genocide, and will peacefully transfer power to those they acknowledge are fascists. They are not antifascists, they are merely the lesser fascists.

        • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          “The Democrats are fascists” is exactly the narrative MAGA espouses. When someone ostensibly anti-MAGA attacks the largest coalition of anti-MAGA forces, that person is pro-MAGA.

          • sudo@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            So in your mind no one can criticize the DNC’s failure to stop fascism or its concessions to said fascist movemet? Our glorious leadership must be blindly followed no matter how many times they fail or give ground to fascists?

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        This sort of thinking is why Democrats keep repeating the same mistakes. Any sort of criticism, even if it’s constructive, is treasonous. It’s always someone else’s fault.

        Organizations either adapt or die. Rejection of criticism is a suicidal, accelerationist position. When people are so concerned with deflecting blame that they’re incapable of performing an honest, frank assessment of which strategies work and which don’t, then you are destined to fail no matter whether its a political party or anything else. If you’d prefer the Democrats keep doing things that don’t work because you’re afraid of them losing face, then your perspective is worthless.

        • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Twisting of words and arguing against a point someone didn’t make is a common alt-right “debate” strategy. Readers please note that I did not say that members of the Democratic party are above criticism. The person I am replying to continues to blame antifascists for the rise of fascism.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            The car just slammed into a wall and it’s backing up and preparing to slam in into the same wall for the third time, and I’m yelling at the driver to turn left so it doesn’t hit the wall again, and your response is like, “Why are you criticizing the driver? You must be trying to distract them so the car crashes!”

            Since you’re totally not saying that the democrats are above criticism, since that’s only me “twisting your words,” why don’t you tell me what the democrats did wrong that they could’ve done differently or could do differently in the future to avoid an outcome like this?

  • pjwestin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Are you fucking kidding? Because Biden 2020 was a progressive platform and Harris 2024 was a centrist one. They weren’t even remotely similar. Biden may be a centrist, but he’s very pro-labor, and he could see how important the progressive base was that election, so he literally sat down with Sanders and hammered out a platform that they could get behind. And while I’ve got a lot of problems with Joe Biden, he actually was very committed to that platform. He really wanted BBB to get through and he kept trying to find ways to abolish student debt.

    Harris, on the other hand, had a handful of disparate, vaguely left policy positions, like the first-time homebuyer’s credit and legalizing pot, but her campaign was mainly centered on economic opportunity for the middle class. She also committed wholeheartedly to the most right-wing polices of the Biden administration, like arming Israel and cracking down on the border. But worst of all, she made bipartisanship and Republican consensus a huge part of her campaign, promising to add Republicans to her cabinet , campaigning with Liz Cheney, and even praising Dick Fucking Cheney.

    TL;DR, Biden campaigned like Obama in 2008, Harris Campaigned like Hillary in 2016. And the results were the same.

    • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Do you even remember 2020? Nobody fucking wanted Biden. He was never progressive. He was literally mocked for telling donors “Nothing will fundamentally change.” People turned out because of how much they hated Trump.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        That actually occurred in 2019, not 2020. After Bernie nearly stomped him in the primary, he made a hard pivot to the left in 2020. As I said, he’s a centrist, but he actually does have a strong history of pro-union activism, which made him a fairly credible (though imperfect) messenger for a populous platform.

      • Akasazh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s almost unfathomable how many people failed to show up to vote, if they disliked Trump that much in 2020. What has Trump done to gather support or apathy about this in so many people?

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          It was more that Kamala did nothing to get them off the couch.

          Biden at least promised student loan forgiveness and did try. It was a shit attempt but credit where it’s due he tried and ended up being able to at least forgive a bunch of public service loans. Kamala promised, what? Help to buy a house? Ok sure. Because we can totally afford that with the cost of groceries today.

        • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Maybe we underestimated how much Covid forced/gave everyone time to pay attention to politics. Or perhaps people saw Trump dodge accountability at every turn and disillusionment in the system bred apathy. It could also be online manipulation pushing Gaza as making Harris/Biden just as bad as Trump. Probably all of the above.

            • ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              Agreed. There’s a tiny paranoid voice in the back of my head saying that with Trump every accusation is a confession and he made a lot of election fraud accusations.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        4 days ago

        I sure did. I was genuinely hopeful when Biden stepped down, and when they announced Walz, I actually got excited. Then they started to try and reach moderate Republicans more and more, and I slowly realized they were doing it again. I felt like I was going insane watching them repeat the strategy that caused them to lose to the same guy in 2016.

        • Kalysta@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          Harris hired a lot of Clinton’s advisors.

          We really need to purge the democratic advisors of their jobs if the dems ever wanna win again. They suck.

      • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        From what I understand, Hillary basically took over this campaign from behind the scenes.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Don’t forget that Biden was the first president to walk a picket line. No other president had ever done that in America’s history. That single action won over the UAW.

      Then, Biden fought back against the railroad corporations and won a contract for workers that includes PTO and other basic labor necessities.

      Then, Biden reduced fentanyl overdoses, something that no president has done in like 30-40 years.

      Couple this with BBB and IRA, you have a much more progressive president than what people give water to it.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Well, I don’t want to give him too much credit. Biden is and always has been a centrist. He has a mixed history on Civil Rights (cause he’s 120 years old), he has a pretty pro-bank history, he’s supported some anti-consumer stuff (like the anti-bankruptcy laws), and he even helped put Clarence Thomas on the bench. And that’s not even touching on his administration, where Gaza and the border will probably be his lasting legacy. But, two things that he’s always been pretty consistent on were unions and infrastructure, and he read the room in 2020 and leaned heavily into those things.

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          Oh I agree. He likely made all of those concessions because 1) he wanted to rally the base following the 2020 primaries, and 2) to stick it to the establishment Dems. Seems like Biden has grown to be quite the grumpy old man to those in the party.

          I agree with you in Gaza and the border. Biden has shown no backbone to Netanyahu, and his administration introduced a border bill that echoed a lot of Trump’s sentiments.

          On the whole, it’s hard to make the call on whether Biden or Harris would have been better to run against Trump, but all that matters now is that we continue the message that establishment Democrats got us here by chasing centrism instead of progress. We need to root out a lot of people who actually do the politicking in the party because if those people aren’t out, we’re doomed to make the same mistakes.

          Hasan Piker put it well the other day. If this were a game of sports, underperformers would be benched pretty aggressively. If this were a job, underperformers would be put on a performance plan (hopefully) or fired straight up.

          There are people consulting Democrats that have failed time and again since 2016, hell even 2008. They need OUT.

          • pjwestin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            3 days ago

            all that matters now is that we continue the message that establishment Democrats got us here by chasing centrism instead of progress. We need to root out a lot of people who actually do the politicking in the party because if those people aren’t out, we’re doomed to make the same mistakes.

            100% this. On Monday, I’m calling my state and federal representatives and telling them DNC chair Jamie Harrison needs to go. Then I’m gonna start looking for movements that will primary anyone who still thinks incrementalism and centrism are a path forward. From now on, Medicare for All and UBI need to be the bare minimum standard for anyone that wants a D in front of their name.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        remember earlier this year when leftists were saying biden never did anything and that he was too old, and started refusing to vote for him and calling for him to drop out, and he did?

        remember the six months following that when leftists were complaining that the person they got biden to drop out for wasn’t good enough and how they weren’t going to vote for her?

        and now that trump won suddenly leftists are singing biden’s praises and blaming trump’s win on the DNC picking a shit candidate?

        • Resonosity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          I honestly have no clue how you constructed your conception of “leftists”.

          Leftists != Tankies != Blue MAGA/Anon != Progressives

          Biden did great things while in office. However, the Left has the liberty to continue pushing the current administration to go farther and implement more policies in line with their ideals. This is a force that counters the Right.

          Biden did not go far enough on Gaza, and neither did Kamala. The same goes for corporations like those in the Oil & Gas sector that raised their prices following oil demobilization during COVID, as well as those that kept their prices high even years after like those producing consumer goods. Could have gone farther.

          When the existing administration makes no concessions to those in the base that voted for that administration but not as their first choice, they have the right to criticize and call out the administration’s failure to represent them.

          All of this would be fixed, or at least alleviated if we abandoned our political duopoly in favor of an electoral and congressional system that allowed for more diversity in government. Ranked choice seems to be taking off in many states.

          Oh, and Kamala was great at the beginning. She took over for Biden, then chose Tim Walz. But then her administration attached itself to Biden, the person that spawned her campaign since the Democratic base utterly rejected him following the debate, and then went after the Right in hope of gaining more votes, taking their own base for granted.

          Now that we have the full scope of Kamala’s campaign, she ran on much more conservative values than Biden did in his campaign leading up to the 2020 election.

          This nuance is not something you’ll see in the mainstream media, perhaps not even on Lemmy. But this is the realm that hopefully progressives like me and some Leftists operate in.

          Your mindset is honestly the same that many ignorant people share regarding science and the scientific method. Things can be true for different reasons and at different times.

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            i’m not debating any of that. i’m just kind of mad at leftists for being mad at the DNC for doing exactly what they told them to do.

      • pjwestin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I do what I can. If the question had been asked in good faith, I might have even been nice about it.

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Ok. First. Those votes were not, like, commies or something. Communists broadly (but not universally ) have no faith in electoral politics beyond the ability to demonstrate how useless electoral politics are for the kinds of change they see as required. The missing votes are likely non-explicitly-ideological Americans, and the disenfranchised left wing of the Democrat coalition, who are not revolutionary socialists - they are better described as social democrats. And why so many of them voted for Biden was, at least in significant part three things that you’re pretending don’t exist with this meme.

    1. Tremendous dislike of Trump… which is actually still true, but he was not currently the president during this election. Trump had just spent the last few months massively fucking up the pandemic response very publicly and got covid immediately prior to the election, which made him look stupid and incompetent.

    2. Because of COVID policies, voting had literally never been easier. Shit loads of people voted early because it was universally available. Led to highest turnout ever.

    3. A competitive democratic primary process meant that we had a candidate selection process people could believe in to some degree. Brenie and Biden ran, and Biden won. Bernie voters saw that, looked at the situation and said “This is tolerable because we had a real process, and we can accept Biden as a stop gap under the conditions of Trump needing to be removed, and Biden being a 1 term President”. It wasn’t 2016, where a significant portion of potential Democrat voters saw the DNC’s treatment of Bernie as unfair, and it wasn’t 2024 where Biden decided to run with no true Primary after the deal was “single term president”, then abruptly dropped out (good idea, shoulda done it 2 years earlier) and effectively appointed his successor by decree.

    2020 was an anomaly, and as is true of 2020 in most data sets, using it as a comparison point requires many many qualifications, but Trump gained 40000 votes, Harris lost 10 million. Trump did not perform better, Harris lost voter enthusiasm, which hasn’t actually been on the Democrat’s side in presidential elections (which have more non-explicitly-ideological voters) since, like, Obama. It’s not even necessarily that she needed to be “more left”. It’s that she needed to reflect the public’s distrust of the political status quo and promise material gain for working people explicitly at the expense of someone else (Trump chose , for instance, immigrants and the democrats as the bad guys, but Harris could have chosen, say, rich fuckers like Musk) . She needed to be ready to rip up the floor boards, and she wasn’t even ready to say she’d break from fucking Biden (who is broadly unpopular) on policy.

    I really, really wish y’all democrats would stop trying to purge your own party of any dissent, because y’all coming out of this with the right lesson will be the difference between a brief period of Republican control, or several elections cycles of Democrats being unviable as a party.

    • SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      True. Thank you. It’s frustrating seeing the DNC shoot itself in the fucking foot to watch people on Lemmy start swinging on anyone but the people who made and executed the failure of a campaign strategy.

      • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        Hey everyone, when you see comments like this from a ““Leftist”” who only ever criticizes “The Dems” for right-wing victories, and never puts the responsibility on the actual, y’know, Trump supporters, that user is a MAGA supporter trying to divide the left and prevent the formulation of a broad antifascist coalition capable of changing the course the GOP has set.

        These “non voters” did not actually sit out the election, they are trying to convince you to sit out the next one (or vote third party etc etc). Don’t fall for it! We are in this together.

        • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Ugh. This is such a toxic attitude.

          Dissent is a good thing. Criticizing yourself is necessary to prevent rot.

          Claiming that anyone that disagrees with the party lines is a Russian or a Trump supporter is insane and smacks of McCarthyism.

          • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            This comment is arguing against points I did not make, and continuing to blame the antifascist coalition for the rise of fascism.

            I wonder, what was the Democratic party wearing when they lost the election?

          • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            But blaming the party and sitting out, or voting 3rd party, everyone knew would lead to Trump winning, just like it did. Not voting for Harris was a vote for Trump, and makes those people just as complicity in his being elected as the people that voted for him. Trying to rationalize it as “Dems need to run a better candidate/campaign/etc” is just cover for not wanting to take responsibility for allowing the man everyone left of the GOP knew was a bad idea, back into power (and with numbers that are going to feed his ego into fascist wet dreams).

            Moral of my rant is this - criticism of the party is fine and should be allowed/encouraged, but trying to blame the party for millions of people handing Trump the presidency is a bad faith argument and should be called out as such each and every time. We are all adults, everyone knew the consequences, and we all made a choice. And people need to start owning that instead of blaming the DNC for not being their unicorn party able to 100% represent a **WAY ** more diverse set of ideals than Trumps singular ideology of hate/fear.

            /rant

            • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              3 days ago

              I’m very sick and tired of being punished by the DNC for not falling in line.

              Like why did they not make Ruth Bader Ginsberg retire before Trump got into office? How could they have not seen that one coming? Everyone saw that happening apparently except for the DNC.

              Same with codifying Roe v Wade. They had many opportunities to codify it and then they supply did not. Now it’s gone.

              Same thing with running the oldest presidential candidate of all time. When people started calling for him to step down, the DNC acted like there was so contingency plan for an 80 candidate.

              And then it was the same shit when they ran Harris. She was so unpopular in the last primary that she had to drop out before any votes were cast. Then they just skipped the primary and ran her as the candidate anyways. Then she lost.

              The DNC acts absolutely hapless.

              • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I think a great deal of the issue on the “left” is that being such a large coalition, with takes all over the place on many topics, is that we have a very hard time getting everyone to fall lockstep behind many things.

                The right has no real platform, and thus can just use their wide propaganda network to just spread their new deflection of the day 24/7, and everyone in that network of lies does their part without question.

                I watched a good video last night talking about how we need to build a network like the right has to spread the lefts talking points, our victories, and our goals. Because the current media landscape constantly bends themselves in knots to not offend the right instead of calling out their lies and bullshit for what it is. We need to stop giving the disinformation a platform outside of the Rights network.

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          You could, possibly, potentially, consider that criticism is coming from a direction that outflanks you on leftism? And that it’s frustrated at the constant party/DC Beltway elitism clutching to neoliberalism during democratic apathy and distrust, and not you?

          • Bigfoot@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s the narrative they espouse, but if you think about it for more than a second, no rational antifascist would attack another antifascist when there are fascists around. It’s all about trying to divide a meaningful antifascist coalition.

            • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Either you are with us, or you are against us

              Where have I heard that before? 🤔

              Division only occurs as people follow their rational self interest - enforcing orthodoxy and silencing dissent to protect the party that failed us all, will only perpetuate their poor performance electorally. People who cannot afford the luxury of blind fealty will go somewhere else - even if that person is a charlatan grifter who never delivers. You cannot defeat populism with more elitism.

              If you interpret an ally trying to help as an attack? Clearly I can’t help you brother

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      I really, really wish y’all democrats would stop trying to purge your own party of any dissent, because y’all coming out of this with the right lesson will be the difference between a brief period of Republican control, or several elections cycles of Democrats being unviable as a party.

      a brief period of Republican control, or several elections cycles of Democrats being unviable as a party.

      a brief period of Republican control

      y’all don’t get it do you. It hasn’t sunk in yet.

      Don’t worry, you’ll get there. Probably in about six months.

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Oh I get it now. You’re saying that “there won’t be a next election”. Careful with the self fufulling prophecies. If you don’t want to succumb to that, I recommend getting involved locally. Whoever you trust electorally will need your help now to build a bulwark for 2026, and getting your hands dirty will help you get over the pessimism.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Get out and vote! Just this time. You won’t have to do it anymore! Four more years, you know what? It’ll be fixed, it’ll be fine, you won’t have to vote anymore.

          https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/vote-four-years/

          no amount of getting involved will stop it from happening.

          first major protest will likely be a bloodbath.

          would love to be wrong, but I doubt it.

      • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 days ago

        Say it then. We’re in the period of time where we must critically evaluate the failures of the political machine that delivered this. I’m trying my level best to provide detailed, informative assessment of what I’m seeing without resorting to vitriol or anger, both online and in real life. If you have additional details, provide them. This is the time for vigorous debate, and reassessment, and I see the Democrats as much more of allies than the Republicans, so if you, or any other liberal can get past the phase where you’re upset with the leftists who have broadly provided critical support for the Democratic coalliton, I welcome your input.

        • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          the leftists who have broadly provided critical support for the Democratic coalliton

          have you not been on lemmy the last six months or are you just blind?

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        y’all don’t get it do you. It hasn’t sunk in yet.

        Don’t worry, you’ll get there. Probably in about six months

        Blue conservatives jerking themselves off over what trump will do to the people they dislike is so fucking god damn cringe.

        Fuck First-past-the-post voting for making me have to be “allies” with you.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          If you actually read Project 2025, I doubt you would feel the same way.

          I find people using the word “cringe” as an adjective embarrassing. I’m embarrassed for you.

          Fuck First-past-the-post voting for making me have to be “allies” with you.

          You know what the problem with socialists like you is? You went AWOL on us while we had the fascists on the ropes. Why in God’s name you would make an enemy out of both the fascists and the Democrats, I have no idea. But you guys did it, now we’re all done.

          So don’t worry, the feeling is mutual. I really don’t think that we’re gonna have to worry about that after the next six months though.

          Be sure to stock up on your Victory Gin and have a double plus good time before they open the “re-education camps”.

          • hark@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            It’s funny that even with this much of a massive loss, you diehard democrats find a way to blame leftists. If such a massive margin of loss is the result of leftists, then that would mean leftists are too big of a group to ignore, but ignore is all you and the rest of the democratic party strategists did during the election so that you could instead curry favor with war criminals like dick cheney and telling people that their concerns of genocide don’t matter. Turns out democrats are more scared of leftists gaining any power than they are of project 2025.

          • zbyte64@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I voted for Harris but if “you guys” were really responsible for loosing then we should have given “them” more representation. But hey, at least this way we don’t have to blame Zionists, transphobies, xenophobes, or misogynists. Right?

  • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    I didn’t want Biden either.

    I don’t know if y’all remember this, but the DNC decided to forgo a primary and forced Harris on us. When she ran in 2020 during the primary, she was so unpopular that she dropped out before any votes were cast.

    Why did anyone ever think she would win? It’s almost identical to when the DNC put Hilary up against Trump.

    You can only fool me with this “lesser evil” bullshit so many times.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      And if they will spend the last minutes they had on primaries, first of all you wouldn’t participate in them anyway because you think they all rigged or whatever, and then you would not vote anyway because whoever won on primaries didn’t have enough time to campaign and you just feel like you don’t know enough about them to make a decision.
      The levels of bullshit you have to come up with to avoid admitting you just collectively wanted Trump to win is astonishing really.

      • abracaDavid@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        You’re doing a whole lot of assuming there. I absolutely vote in the primaries.

        Accusing me of wanting Trump in office is just dead wrong.

        This is why the DNC fails. Y’all instantly attack anyone that doesn’t “fall in line” and immediately alienate them.

        It’s honestly a bit pathetic that you can’t even hear any criticism of the party.

        • Nalivai@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Hey, good for you, you voted. Most people didn’t.
          They wanted Trump to win, or didn’t care who does. They are at fault. They had the ability to change the course of election and chose this way. Even trump supporters are less at fault, they’re in a cult, their brain fell off, they don’t have a choice.
          Democratic party cares about opinions of people who vote for them, it’s that simple.

      • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Any criticism of The Party immediately means they want Trump, “no it’s the voters who are wrong”

        I vote in all the primaries - and it’s a sobering assessment that pulling “Uncommitted” in 2024 was my most enthusiastic electoral participation since 2008. I still voted for Dem harm reduction for the general - in a swing state thankyouverymuch - but look at where we are. 100% unified neo-fash/nativist government with Trump at the helm.

        Why is the Democratic National Committee so afraid of either listening to, or allowing the electorate to participate?